Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/4534
Title: | Integrating Eurocode 7 (load and resistance factor design) using nonconventional factoring strategies in slope stability analysis | Authors: | Pantelidis, Lysandros Griffiths, D.V. |
Major Field of Science: | Engineering and Technology | Field Category: | Civil Engineering | Keywords: | Slope stability;Load and resistance factor design (LRFD);Factoring strategy;Ultimate limit state;Limit state method;Eurocode 7 | Issue Date: | Feb-2014 | Source: | Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2014, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 208-216 | Volume: | 51 | Issue: | 2 | Start page: | 208 | End page: | 216 | Journal: | Canadian Geotechnical Journal | Abstract: | In traditional allowable stress design, as known, the safety factor is calculated with respect to shear strength of soil(s) by dividing the available shear strength by the mobilized stresses. The limit-state method, on the other hand, compares — in the form of the inequality Ed ≤ Rd— the effects of all the actions, Ed, with the corresponding resistance of the ground, Rd. Although this method considers different loading conditions by using suitable combinations of design values, it is still based on direct comparison of the available shear strength with the mobilized stresses. In the present paper, various factoring strategies (in addition to the traditional one with respect to shear strength of soils) are integrated into a limit-state method framework. Eurocode 7 has been chosen for this purpose. The whole procedure aims at giving a more comprehensive insight into the design of slopes and the sensitivity of safety level of slopes to the various parameters. In addition, the proposed methodology, as shown, may result in a safety level of slopes signifi- cantly lower than the respective one obtained using the limit-state method in its traditional form. As man-made slopes that conform to design standards often fail in practice, even though conservative input values are used, these failures must be treated with more skepticism by practitioners adopting supplementary design practices such the one presented herein. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/4534 | ISSN: | 12086010 | DOI: | 10.1139/cgj-2013-0239 | Rights: | © Canadian Science | Type: | Article | Affiliation : | Cyprus University of Technology University of Colorado Newcastle University |
Publication Type: | Peer Reviewed |
Appears in Collections: | Άρθρα/Articles |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
11
checked on Nov 8, 2023
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
8
Last Week
0
0
Last month
0
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023
Page view(s)
639
Last Week
0
0
Last month
1
1
checked on Jan 30, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.