Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/4318
Title: Multiple perspectives on engaging future engineers
Authors: Wilson, Denise Michelle 
Adams, Robin S. 
Evangelou, Demetra 
English, Lyn 
De Figueiredo, António Dias 
Mousoulides, Nicholas 
Pawley, Alice L. 
Schifellite, Carmen 
Stevens, Reed R. 
Svinicki, Marilla D. 
Trenor, Julie Martin 
Major Field of Science: Social Sciences
Field Category: Civil Engineering
Keywords: Epistemological development;Multiple perspectives;Complexity
Issue Date: Jan-2011
Source: Journal of Engineering Education, 2011, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 48-88
Volume: 100
Issue: 1
Start page: 48
End page: 88
Journal: Journal of Engineering Education 
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Engaging future engineers is a central topic in everyday conversations on engineering education. Considerable investments have been made to make engineering more engaging, recruit and retain aspiring engineers, and to design an education to prepare future engineers. However, the impact of these efforts has been less than intended. It is imperative that the community reflects on progress and sets a more effective path for the future. PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to map a new innovation landscape for what it means to engage future engineers. This is a theoretically grounded divergent-thinking effort to enable a broader space of high impact innovations for engaging future engineers. SCOPE/METHOD: A multiple perspectives methodology drawing from innovation, cross-disciplinary, and boundary work frameworks was used to make visible multiple facets of engaging future engineers. Scholars from diverse communities of thought and discourse were selected to present interparadigmatic perspectives, act as boundary agents, challenge and transform current ways of thinking, and illustrate new opportunities for engineering education innovation. CONCLUSIONS: A new innovation landscape for engaging future engineers is needed, one that emphasizes epistemological development and social justice, new configurations on engineering thinking and connecting to the formative years of development, the entwinement of engineering knowing and being, and mutually informing consequences for opening up a broader space for innovation.We also need to adopt strategies and tools for using a multiple perspectives approach to better understand complex engineering education problems. 2011 ASEE.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/4318
ISSN: 21689830
DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00004.x
Rights: © ASEE
Type: Article
Affiliation : Purdue University 
Queensland University of Technology 
University of Coimbra 
Cyprus University of Technology 
Purdue University 
Ryerson University 
Brock University 
Northwestern University 
University of Texas 
University Station D5800 
Clemson University 
University of Washington 
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles

CORE Recommender
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

204
checked on Nov 9, 2023

Page view(s) 10

554
Last Week
4
Last month
10
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.