Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3854
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEfstathiou, George-
dc.contributor.authorTsangari, Haritini-
dc.contributor.authorSuhonen, Riitta-
dc.contributor.authorLeino-Kilpi, Helena-
dc.contributor.authorPatiraki, Elisabeth-
dc.contributor.authorKarlou, Chrysoula-
dc.contributor.authorBalogh, Zoltan-
dc.contributor.authorPalese, Alvisa-
dc.contributor.authorTomietto, Marco-
dc.contributor.authorJarosova, Darja-
dc.contributor.authorMerkouris, Anastasios-
dc.contributor.authorPapastavrou, Evridiki-
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-25T11:14:58Zen
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-17T09:30:32Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-09T09:45:14Z-
dc.date.available2012-05-25T11:14:58Zen
dc.date.available2013-05-17T09:30:32Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-09T09:45:14Z-
dc.date.issued2011-08-11-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2012, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 1026–1037en_US
dc.identifier.issn13652648-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3854-
dc.description.abstractAim. This paper is a report of an international study of patients’ and nurses’ perceptions of nurse caring behaviours. Background. Current economic constraints on healthcare systems, demand to increase the quality of care and the incorporation of the consumers’ perspective into care, have created a need to develop a clear understanding of nursing behaviours which convey caring. Patients in different areas of the world report different expectations of nurses’ caring actions when compared to nurses’ views. Method.  A descriptive comparative survey design was used to analyse a sample of surgical patients (n = 1659) and their nurses (n = 1195) in 88 wards of 34 hospitals in Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Finland, Greece, Hungary and Italy. Data were collected in autumn 2009 using the Caring Behaviours Inventory-24. Nurses’ and patients’ responses were compared using both inferential and descriptive statistics. Results.  Independent samples t-tests showed important differences between nurses’ and patients’ views. Although both groups perceived knowledge and skill as being the most important sub-scale, the nurses’ responses were higher compared to patients (P < 0·05) with important differences in the ‘assurance of human presence’ (P < 0·001) and the ‘respectful deference to others’ (P < 0·001) sub-scales. Cross-country comparisons showed important differences between the nurses’ (F = 24·199, P < 0·001) and patients’ views on caring (F = 26·945, P < 0·001). Conclusions.  Important differences were observed between patient–nurse perceptions in the participating countries. The results form a foundation for future research into the development of a common international perspective about caring behaviours between patients and their nurses.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Advanced Nursingen_US
dc.rights© Blackwellen_US
dc.subjectCaring behavioursen_US
dc.subjectCaring Behaviours Inventory cross-cultural comparisonen_US
dc.subjectInternationalen_US
dc.subjectNursesen_US
dc.subjectPatientsen_US
dc.subjectPerceptionsen_US
dc.titleA Cross-cultural Study of the Concept of Caring Through Behaviours: Patients’ and Nurses’ Perspectives in Six Different EU Countriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationNational and Kapodistrian University of Athensen_US
dc.collaborationSemmelweis Universityen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Udineen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Veronaen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Ostravaen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Nicosiaen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Turkuen_US
dc.subject.categoryHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.reviewpeer reviewed-
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryFinlanden_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.countryHungaryen_US
dc.countryItalyen_US
dc.countryCzech Republicen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05807.xen_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/118en
dc.relation.issue5en_US
dc.relation.volume68en_US
cut.common.academicyear2011-2012en_US
dc.identifier.spage1026en_US
dc.identifier.epage1037en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1365-2648-
crisitem.journal.publisherWiley-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8515-007X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-5128-3651-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
j.1365-2648.2011.05807.x.pdf101.15 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

62
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 50

60
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 10

525
Last Week
3
Last month
13
checked on May 10, 2024

Download(s) 10

269
checked on May 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.