Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3795
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChappell, Neena L.-
dc.contributor.authorKatajisto, Jouko-
dc.contributor.authorCharalambous, Andreas-
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-29T11:15:05Zen
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-17T09:30:42Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-09T09:42:37Z-
dc.date.available2012-11-29T11:15:05Zen
dc.date.available2013-05-17T09:30:42Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-09T09:42:37Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationGeriatric Nursing, 2012, vol.33, no. 1, pp.17-27en_US
dc.identifier.issn01974572-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3795-
dc.description.abstractIndividualized nursing care, a form of person-centered care delivery, is accepted as best practice, yet its implementation into actual care is far from complete. Appropriate measures of this elusive concept are needed to better understand barriers to implementation. This study explored and tested the convergent validity and the reliability of 2 individualized nursing care measures. A cross-sectional survey design was used to collect data using the Individualized Care Scale and the Individualized Care Instrument (ICI) from a sample of nurses (n = 263, response rate 71%) working in older peoples' care settings in Finland, and the data were analyzed statistically. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the ICI scales (.63–.80) and ICS-A and B subscales (both α = .91) demonstrated only moderate correlation between the 2 instruments (r = –.39 to .50) and possibly the complexity of measuring “individualized care.” The study acknowledges the latent influence of culture and care approach to the conceptualization of individuality. It concludes that the concept may best be measured at this point with the use of other factors in addition to instruments to capture its multiple domainsen_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofGeriatric Nursingen_US
dc.rights© 2012, Elsevieren_US
dc.subjectMeasurementen_US
dc.subjectNursingen_US
dc.titleThe Conceptualization and Measurement of Individualized Careen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Victoriaen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.reviewpeer reviewed-
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryCanadaen_US
dc.countryFinlanden_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gerinurse.2011.10.001en_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/118en
dc.relation.issue1en_US
dc.relation.volume33en_US
cut.common.academicyear2020-2021en_US
dc.identifier.spage17en_US
dc.identifier.epage27en_US
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4050-031X-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

18
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 50

13
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

480
Last Week
0
Last month
2
checked on Jan 30, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.