Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3766
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKalogirou, Fotini-
dc.contributor.authorLamnisos, Demetris-
dc.contributor.authorSourtzi, Panayota A.-
dc.contributor.authorLambrinou, Ekaterini-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-09T07:58:58Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-09T09:42:09Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-09T07:58:58Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-09T09:42:09Z-
dc.date.issued2012-05-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 2012 vol.49, no.5, pp. 610-624en_US
dc.identifier.issn00207489-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3766-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Heart failure (HF) is a clinical condition with major socioeconomic burden. Scientists are trying to find effective solutions to eliminate the effects of the disease and the current innovations in research address the introduction of HF management programmes (HF-MPs). Objectives: A meta-analysis was undertaken to estimate the effect of HF-MP with a nurse-driven pre-discharge phase on the outcomes of HF and all-cause re-admission. Data sources: A systematic search of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Cochrane Library (reviews and clinical trials) was performed to locate randomised controlled trials (RCTs), published in English language, which implemented any HF-MP with discharge planning carried out by a nurse. Identified articles were further screened for additional studies. Study selection: Two reviewers independently screened relevant abstracts or titles using a standardised predefined check list. Pilot studies, studies additionally assessing other conditions and studies that evolved technology utilities or included medication management beyond optimisation of therapy, were excluded. Data extraction: Selected articles were thoroughly screened and data of interest (characteristics and outcomes) were obtained. Quality assessment was done by two reviewers separately. Data synthesis: Nineteen RCTs were selected for the meta-analysis. The overall pooled effect (relative risk, RR) of the intervention group compared with the control group was estimated by using a random effects analysis (95% confidence interval (CI)) for the outcomes of HF-related re-admission and all-cause re-admission. The overall RR of HF re-admissions was 0.68, 95% CI (0.53, 0.86), . p<. 0.05 and of all-cause re-admission was 0.85, 95% CI (0.76, 0.94), . p<. 0.05 favouring the intervention. Metaregression analysis was performed while trying to explain the observed heterogeneity but none of the factors (environment, duration of follow-up, origin and complexity) were significantly related with the RR.No significant publication bias was observed regarding both HF and all-cause re-admission. Conclusions: The results of the current meta-analysis highlight the potential of HF-MPs with nurse-driven pre-discharge interventions to reduce hospital re-admissions. Essential characteristics or components of a successful HF-MP are still to be determined, thus more studies are required to solve this issue. 2011 Elsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Nursing Studiesen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2014 Elsevieren_US
dc.subjectHeart failureen_US
dc.subjectHospital dischargeen_US
dc.subjectMeta analysisen_US
dc.subjectNurseen_US
dc.subjectNursingen_US
dc.subjectHeart Failureen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectPatient Dischargeen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of heart failure management programmes with nurse-led discharge planning in reducing re-admissions: A systematic review and meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationNational and Kapodistrian University of Athensen_US
dc.subject.categoryBasic Medicineen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.reviewPeer Reviewed-
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.11.002en_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/118en
dc.relation.issue5en_US
dc.relation.volume49en_US
cut.common.academicyear2011-2012en_US
dc.identifier.spage610en_US
dc.identifier.epage624en_US
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.journal.journalissn0020-7489-
crisitem.journal.publisherElsevier-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

86
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 20

76
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

530
Last Week
1
Last month
4
checked on Feb 2, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.