Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3764
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPatiraki, Elisabeth-
dc.contributor.authorEfstathiou, George-
dc.contributor.authorNikitara, Monica-
dc.contributor.authorTsangari, Haritini-
dc.contributor.authorMerkouris, Anastasios-
dc.contributor.authorKarlou, Chrysoula-
dc.contributor.authorPalese, Alvisa-
dc.contributor.authorTomietto, Marco-
dc.contributor.authorBalogh, Zoltan-
dc.contributor.authorSuhonen, Riitta-
dc.contributor.authorLeino-Kilpi, Helena-
dc.contributor.authorJarosova, Darja-
dc.contributor.authorPapastavrou, Evridiki-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-09T08:09:18Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-09T09:42:08Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-09T08:09:18Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-09T09:42:08Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationNosileftiki, 2010, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 406-417en_US
dc.identifier.issn22413409-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3764-
dc.description.abstractBackground: International literature identifies many gaps in the concept of caring. Investigation is needed in order to understand how nurses and patients perceive caring. Aim: To examine and compare the concept of caring and individualized caring as perceived by patients and nurses, and to assess the levels of patient satisfaction with nursing care in 6 European countries. Method: In this study, which was the pilot phase of a larger project, 369 persons participated, 182 nurses and 187 patients, recruited by the convenience sampling process, in 6 European countries, Cyprus, Greece, Finland, Hungary, Italy and the Czech Republic. The response rate was 78.11% for nurses and 83.11% for patients. Data were collected from surgical units during May 2009. For the purpose of this study, three instruments were used: (a) the Caring Behaviors Inventory (CBI) which measures the frequency of the provided caring as perceived by both nurses and patients, (b) the Individualized Care Scale (ICS) which examines the support and provision of individualized care in two dimensions, ICS-A support, ICS-B provision, and (c) the Patient Satisfaction Scale (PSS) which examines the patients' satisfaction with the nursing care received. Descriptive statistics, t-test, chi-square and ANOVA were performed for analysis of the responses. The level of statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: Statistically significant difference between the views of patients and nurses was observed only for ICS-A (p=0.001), with nurses scoring higher than patients. The concept of individualized care was not supported by the nurses, although they reported that they offered it to the patients. The patients' satisfaction with the nursing care they received was reported high. Satisfaction with nursing care was significantly correlated with the frequency of the provision of nursing care (r=0.764, p<0.001), with the support of the idea of individualized care (r=0.674, p<0.001), and with receipt of individualized care (r=0.701, p<0.001). Conclusions: The study findings partially support reports in the relevant literature of differences between the perceptions of nurses and patients about care, general and individualised. They fully support previous findings that nursing caring behavior is highly correlated with patient satisfaction. The lack of such studies at the European and international level demonstrates the need for further analysis of this concept using larger samples.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofNosileftikien_US
dc.subjectCaringen_US
dc.subjectIndividualized nursing careen_US
dc.subjectPatient satisfactionen_US
dc.titleThe concept of caring in nursing: results from a pilot research studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Nicosiaen_US
dc.collaborationNational and Kapodistrian University of Athensen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Udineen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Turkuen_US
dc.collaborationSemmelweis Universityen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Ostravaen_US
dc.subject.categoryHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.reviewPeer Reviewed-
dc.countryCzech Republicen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.countryItalyen_US
dc.countryHungaryen_US
dc.countryFinlanden_US
dc.countryCzech Republicen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/118en
dc.relation.issue4en_US
dc.relation.volume49en_US
cut.common.academicyear2010-2011en_US
dc.identifier.spage406en_US
dc.identifier.epage417en_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.journalissn11056843-
crisitem.journal.publisherHellenic Nurses Association-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8515-007X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-5128-3651-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

457
Last Week
0
Last month
3
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.