Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3423
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLambertides, Neophytos-
dc.contributor.authorPanayides, Photis-
dc.contributor.authorSavva, Christos S.-
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-28T12:40:32Zen
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-17T08:42:36Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T08:57:13Z-
dc.date.available2013-01-28T12:40:32Zen
dc.date.available2013-05-17T08:42:36Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-08T08:57:13Z-
dc.date.issued2011-09-
dc.identifier.citationTransportation research part e: logistics and transportation review, 2011, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 681–694en_US
dc.identifier.issn13665545-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3423-
dc.description.abstractThis paper contributes to the maritime transport literature by examining the relative efficiency of firms in the three key sectors of the shipping industry, i.e. dry, wet and container shipping. Two relative efficiency models are developed to assess relative market and relative operating performance efficiency. The theoretical framework of fundamental analysis is adopted to derive the inputs and outputs in the efficiency models which are assessed using data envelopment and stochastic frontier analysis. Shipping companies were found to exhibit average market efficiency. Market and operating performance efficiency of maritime firms is not consistent. Tanker companies are more market efficient whereas container shipping firms are found to have high operating performance efficiency but were market inefficient. Dry bulk firms were found to have the lowest ratings of market efficiencyen_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTransportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Reviewen_US
dc.rights© Elsevieren_US
dc.subjectFundamental analysisen_US
dc.subjectRelative efficiencyen_US
dc.subjectShipping firmsen_US
dc.titleThe relative efficiency of shipping companiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryEconomics and Businessen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.reviewpeer reviewed-
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tre.2011.01.001en_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/92en
dc.relation.issue5en_US
dc.relation.volume47en_US
cut.common.academicyear2011-2012en_US
dc.identifier.spage681en_US
dc.identifier.epage694en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1366-5545-
crisitem.journal.publisherElsevier-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Finance, Accounting and Management Science-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Shipping-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Finance, Accounting and Management Science-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Tourism Management, Hospitality and Entrepreneurship-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Management and Economics-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Tourism Management, Hospitality and Entrepreneurship-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2864-1793-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0593-1464-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6562-4816-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Management and Economics-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Management and Economics-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Management and Economics-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

59
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

53
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

420
Last Week
3
Last month
3
checked on Jul 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.