Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3386
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDemosthenous, Maz-
dc.contributor.authorKrambia-Kapardis, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorDemosthenous, Maz-
dc.contributor.otherΚραμβιά-Καπαρδή, Μαρία-
dc.date2010en
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-09T07:26:15Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T08:29:55Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-09T07:26:15Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-08T08:29:55Z-
dc.date.issued2010-01-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Knowledge, Culture, and Change in Organizations: Annual Review, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 373-383en_US
dc.identifier.issn14479575-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3386-
dc.description.abstractThe debate of whether males and females have the same level of moral reasoning is one that produces inconclusive results. For many professionals the concept of 'professional ethics' is one that implies that each individual has the moral reasoning capability to allow them to render business judgement without having self-interest to alter or impair their professional responsibility. Evidence in business ethics research suggests that the moral reasoning levels of some business students e.g. accounting students and accountants are in the lower range in comparison to other students and other professionals. The objective of this study is to investigate and report the moral reasoning levels of Cypriot business students and whether there are gender differences. This study uses Kohlberg's moral development theory as a framework and Rest's Defining Issues Test (DIT) as a measuring instrument to measure the moral reasoning of the students. This study found that Cypriot students' level of moral reasoning as measured by the DIT is at a very low level in comparison with other university students and there is no significant difference between the male and female students moral reasoning. Common Ground, Maz Demosthenous, Maria Krambia-Kapardis.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Knowledge, Culture, and Change in Organizations: Annual Reviewen_US
dc.rights© Common Ground Research Networksen_US
dc.subjectBusiness Ethicsen_US
dc.subjectKohlberg Moral Development Theoryen_US
dc.subjectDefining Issues Testen_US
dc.subjectMoral Reasoningen_US
dc.subjectEthical Decision Makingen_US
dc.subjectBusiness Studentsen_US
dc.titleMoral reasoning of cypriot business students: A long way off perfectionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationFlinders Universityen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryEconomics and Businessen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.reviewNON PEER-REVIEWED-
dc.countryAustraliaen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/85en
dc.relation.issue1en_US
dc.relation.volume10en_US
cut.common.academicyear2010-2011en_US
dc.identifier.spage373en_US
dc.identifier.epage383en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Management, Entrepreneurship and Digital Business-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Tourism Management, Hospitality and Entrepreneurship-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-7762-1118-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Tourism Management, Hospitality and Entrepreneurship-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

451
Last Week
1
Last month
3
checked on Oct 5, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.