Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3354
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorConstanti, Panayiotis-
dc.contributor.authorZopiatis, Anastasios-
dc.contributor.otherΖωπιάτης, Αναστάσιος-
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-03T13:26:20Zen
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-17T08:42:08Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T08:28:51Z-
dc.date.available2010-02-03T13:26:20Zen
dc.date.available2013-05-17T08:42:08Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-08T08:28:51Z-
dc.date.issued2010-04-20-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 2010, vol. 22, no.3, pp.300-319en_US
dc.identifier.issn09596119-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3354-
dc.description.abstractThe primary purpose of the study was to investigate the association between leadership styles and burnout among hospitality managers currently working in the industry of Cyprus. Specifically, transformational, transactional and passive/avoidance were investigated in order to establish which leadership style is more prone to burnout effects. Design/methodology/approach - Adopting a quantitative approach, the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ 5X-Short) was utilized to allow research participants to describe their leadership style as they perceive it. In addition, the most widely acknowledged tool for measuring burnout, the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), was also incorporated in the questionnaire, which was then distributed to 500 hospitality managers in Cyprus. A number of hypotheses, reflecting the primary objective of the study, were postulated. Findings - The findings suggest that transformational leadership has a significant positive association with personal accomplishment and is negatively related to emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. In addition a positive relationship exists between passive avoidance leadership and emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. Finally, individuals with a passive avoidance leadership style exhibited higher levels of burnout. Research limitations/implications - It is well documented in the literature that surveys measuring sensitive issues, such as leadership styles and burnout levels, have inbuilt limitations (Hunt, 1999; Antonakis et al., 2003). With regards to leadership, the authors acknowledge that they were not able to replicate the original nine-factor solution of the MLQ 5X, therefore, findings should be viewed with caution. The second limitation is the small sample size (n=131) and the homogeneity of the sample, which limit the generalizability of the findings. Practical implications - The findings have a practical relevance to both hospitality stakeholders and academic scholars who wish to further explore the leadership-burnout association. In addition, Human Resources practitioners could utilize the findings when developing strategies for recruiting and developing leaders. Originality/value - The paper adds to existing knowledge by investigating an issue presented in just a few hospitality-related studies. While burnout and leadership separately, have captured the attention of hospitality researchers, studies investigating their association are ubiquitous by their absence. The insights derived from this paper are of value to academic scholars wishing to build on this exploratory investigation.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Managementen_US
dc.rights© Emeralden_US
dc.subjectLeadership stylesen_US
dc.subjectBurnouten_US
dc.subjectHospitality Industryen_US
dc.subjectCyprusen_US
dc.titleLeadership Styles and Burnout: is there an association?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.linkhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/viewContentItem.do;jsessionid=EBC4312ED15474A71BB5F031A17795E1?contentType=Article&contentId=1817167en_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Nicosiaen_US
dc.subject.categoryEconomics and Businessen_US
dc.journalsHybrid Open Accessen_US
dc.reviewpeer reviewed-
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/85en
dc.relation.issue3en_US
dc.relation.volume22en_US
cut.common.academicyear2010-2011en_US
dc.identifier.spage300en_US
dc.identifier.epage319en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn0959-6119-
crisitem.journal.publisherEmerald-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Hospitality and Tourism Management-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Tourism Management, Hospitality and Entrepreneurship-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5171-0200-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Tourism Management, Hospitality and Entrepreneurship-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

571
Last Week
1
Last month
8
checked on May 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.