Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/33203
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVahamidis, Petros-
dc.contributor.authorChachalis, Demosthenis-
dc.contributor.authorAkrivou, Antigoni-
dc.contributor.authorKaranasios, Evangelos-
dc.contributor.authorGanopoulou, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorArgiri, Apostolia-
dc.contributor.authorMandoulaki, Athanasia-
dc.contributor.authorHatzigiannakis, Evangelos-
dc.contributor.authorArampatzis, Georgios-
dc.contributor.authorPanagopoulos, Andreas-
dc.contributor.authorMantzouni, Irene-
dc.contributor.authorMarkellou, Emilia-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-21T08:34:46Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-21T08:34:46Z-
dc.date.issued2024-03-21-
dc.identifier.citationAgronomy, 2024, vol. 14, iss. 3, Article number 640en_US
dc.identifier.issn20734395-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/33203-
dc.description.abstractGaining a comprehensive understanding of how weed communities respond to both environmental and human-induced factors is of paramount importance in developing effective and ecologically sound weed control strategies. The objectives of the current research were to (1) assess the effect of the main weed management practices used in Greek olive groves on weed species’ diversity; (2) explore the filtering effect of management, site, and soil variables in determining weed species’ composition; and (3) shed light on the association between weed species’ composition and the diversity of the understory vegetation of olive groves. To accomplish these objectives, winter weed species’ coverage was assessed in 116 olive groves, both conventional and organic, distributed across three provinces in southern Greece. The investigation encompassed 29 explanatory variables, categorized into three groups: soil (22), management practices (6), and site conditions (1). It was confirmed that glyphosate use may lower biodiversity and species richness; however, this trend was not universal. In fact, the negative influence of the presence of Oxalis pes-caprae L. on species richness and diversity far outweighed the effect of spraying glyphosate. Redundancy analysis (RDA) revealed that among the 29 variables used to describe the ecological niche, eight (i.e., Mn, Mg, chemical spraying, mowing, rotary tiller, grazing, irrigation, and elevation) were significant and explained 21.5% of the total variation in weed species’ data. Interestingly, the soil Mn concentration was identified as the most influential one, highlighting the importance of soil micronutrients in determining weed species’ composition. The variation partitioning procedure demonstrated that the effect of the management variables on weed species’ composition accounted for 2.2 times the variance of soil variables and 4.5 times the variance of elevation. The present findings might help to enhance optimal management in olive groves that can sustain the biodiversity of flora and, in turn, provide various ecosystem services to agro-ecosystems.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAgronomyen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectbiodiversityen_US
dc.subjectglyphosateen_US
dc.subjectolive grovesen_US
dc.subjectredundancy analysisen_US
dc.subjectsoil propertiesen_US
dc.subjectweed floraen_US
dc.subjectweed managementen_US
dc.titleWeed Species’ Diversity and Composition as Shaped by the Interaction of Management, Site, and Soil Variables in Olive Groves of Southern Greeceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationBenaki Phytopathological Instituteen_US
dc.collaborationAristotle University of Thessalonikien_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Thessalyen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationSoil and Water Resources Instituteen_US
dc.subject.categoryOther Agricultural Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldAgricultural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/agronomy14030640en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85188781566-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85188781566-
dc.relation.issue3en_US
dc.relation.volume14en_US
cut.common.academicyear2024-2025en_US
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.journal.journalissn2073-4395-
crisitem.journal.publisherMDPI-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
agronomy-14-00640-v2.pdf2.72 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

39
Last Week
3
Last month
20
checked on Jan 30, 2025

Download(s)

15
checked on Jan 30, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons