Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/33140
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorProdromou, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorTheocharidis, Christos-
dc.contributor.authorGitas, Ioannis Z.-
dc.contributor.authorEliades, Filippos-
dc.contributor.authorThemistocleous, Kyriacos-
dc.contributor.authorPapasavvas, Konstantinos-
dc.contributor.authorDimitrakopoulos, Constantinos-
dc.contributor.authorDanezis, Chris-
dc.contributor.authorHadjimitsis, Diofantos G.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-05T10:36:44Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-05T10:36:44Z-
dc.date.issued2024-04-01-
dc.identifier.citationRemote Sensing, 2024, vol. 16, no. 8en_US
dc.identifier.issn20724292-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/33140-
dc.description.abstractAccurate mapping of forest habitats, especially in NATURA sites, is essential information for forest monitoring and sustainable management but also for habitat characterisation and ecosystem functioning. Remote sensing data and spatial modelling allow accurate mapping of the presence and distribution of tree species and habitats and are valuable tools for the long-term assessment of habitat status required by the European Commission. In order to serve the above, the present study aims to propose a methodology to accurately map the spatial distribution of forest habitats in three NATURA2000 sites of Cyprus by employing Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data as well as topographic features using the Google Earth Engine (GEE). A pivotal aspect of the methodology identified was that the best band combination of the Random Forest (RF) classifier achieves the highest performance for mapping the dominant habitats in the three case studies. Specifically, in the Akamas region, eight habitat types have been mapped, in Paphos nine and six in Troodos. These habitat types are included in three of the nine habitat groups based on the EU’s Habitat Directive: the sclerophyllous scrub, rocky habitats and caves and forests. The results show that using the RF algorithm achieves the highest performance, especially using Dataset 6, which is based on S2 bands, spectral indices and topographical features, and Dataset 13, which includes S2, S1, spectral indices and topographical features. These datasets achieve an overall accuracy (OA) of approximately 91–94%. In contrast, Dataset 7, which includes only S1 bands and Dataset 9, which combines S1 bands and spectral indices, achieve the lowest performance with an OA of approximately 25–43%.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCyprus University of Technology Directorate General for European Programmes, Coordination and Development Horizon 2020 Framework Programmeen_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofRemote Sensingen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectNATURA2000en_US
dc.subjectCyprusen_US
dc.subjectGoogle Earth Engineen_US
dc.subjectmachine learningen_US
dc.subjectRandom Foresten_US
dc.titleForest Habitat Mapping in Natura2000 Regions in Cyprus Using Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Topographical Featuresen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationAristotle University of Thessalonikien_US
dc.subject.categoryCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs16081373en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85191400703-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85191400703-
dc.relation.issue8en_US
dc.relation.volume16en_US
cut.common.academicyear2024-2025en_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.journal.journalissn2072-4292-
crisitem.journal.publisherMDPI-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2974-8832-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4080-441X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4149-8282-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0248-1085-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2684-547X-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
remotesensing-16-01373-v3.pdf50.75 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

37
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s)

9
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons