Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/33047
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJohannessen, Janne Bondi-
dc.contributor.authorLundquist, Björn-
dc.contributor.authorRodina, Yulia-
dc.contributor.authorTengesdal, Eirik-
dc.contributor.authorKaldhol, Nina Hagen-
dc.contributor.authorTürker, Emel-
dc.contributor.authorFyndanis, Valantis-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-09T06:09:10Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-09T06:09:10Z-
dc.date.issued2024-03-21-
dc.identifier.citationSecond Language Research, 2024en_US
dc.identifier.issn02676583-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/33047-
dc.description.abstractThe present study examines grammatical gender knowledge in offline production (gender marking on indefinite articles) and online gender processing (visual world paradigm) in adult second language (L2) learners of Norwegian with three different first languages (L1s): Greek, Russian, and Turkish. In particular, it investigates the role of the following factors: (1) presence vs. absence of grammatical gender in L1 (Norwegian, Greek and Russian have gender, whereas Turkish does not), (2) lexical gender congruency, (3) structural similarity between L1 and L2 in the realization of gender, and (4) proficiency in L2. In offline production, no difference was found between the three L2 groups: they all overused the default gender (masculine). However, L1 effects were observed in the eye-tracking task, where the high-proficiency L1 Greek and L1 Russian speakers showed earlier and more prominent signs of predictive gender processing compared to the high-proficiency L1 Turkish speakers. There were no effects of lexical gender congruency or structural similarity. This suggests that, when it comes to predictive gender processing, what matters is proficiency and the presence vs. absence of grammatical gender in the L1. We interpret the findings in the context of current approaches to predictive processing emphasizing the role of cue reliability and utility.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSecond Language Researchen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectcross-linguistic effectsen_US
dc.subjectgrammatical gender assignmenten_US
dc.subjectGreeken_US
dc.subjectlexical gender congruencyen_US
dc.subjectNorwegianen_US
dc.subjectpredictive processingen_US
dc.subjectRussianen_US
dc.subjectstructural/syntactic congruencyen_US
dc.subjectTurkishen_US
dc.titleCross-linguistic effects in grammatical gender assignment and predictive processing in L1 Greek, L1 Russian, and L1 Turkish speakers of Norwegian as a second languageen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUiT The Arctic University of Norwayen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Osloen_US
dc.collaborationOslo Metropolitan Universityen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryNorwayen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldHumanitiesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/02676583241227709en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85188515165-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85188515165-
cut.common.academicyear2024-2025en_US
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9403-3468-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
2024 Fyndanis.pdfopen access2.86 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

14
checked on Oct 12, 2024

Download(s)

4
checked on Oct 12, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons