Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/33023
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVorster, Martin-
dc.contributor.authorvan der Vyver, Peet J.-
dc.contributor.authorMarkou, George-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-03T14:20:08Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-03T14:20:08Z-
dc.date.issued2022-07-01-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Endodontics, 2022, vol.48 no.7, pp. 887-892en_US
dc.identifier.issn00992399-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/33023-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The aim was to compare the glide path and final preparation times of WaveOne Gold and TruNatomy in conjunction with two different endodontic access cavity designs in extracted human molar teeth. Methods: 60 extracted human mandibular molars with mesiobuccal canals were selected and randomly divided into two different access cavity design preparation groups (n = 30). Traditional access cavities (TAC) and conservative access cavities (CAC). Within each cavity design group, the 30 teeth were divided in to two instrumentation groups (WaveOne Gold Primary (n = 15) and TruNatomy Prime (n = 15)). Group 1: TAC, #10 stainless steel manual K-file followed by WaveOne Gold Glider and WaveOne Gold Primary. Group 2: CAC, #10 stainless steel manual K-file followed by WaveOne Gold Glider and WaveOne Gold Primary. Group 3: TAC, #10 stainless steel manual K-file followed by TruNatomy Orifice Modifier and Glider and TruNatomy Prime. Group 4: CAC, #10 stainless steel manual K-file followed by TruNatomy Glider and TruNatomy Prime. Glide path and final preparation times were recorded. Results: Shaping time with TruNatomy Glider in combination with TruNatomy Prime instruments were faster compared to the WaveOne Gold Glider/ WaveOne Gold Primary instruments regardless of the type of access cavity preparation. TAC design yielded faster preparation time (38.2 ± 4.57 seconds) compared to the CAC (55.6 ± 6.91 seconds) in the WaveOne Gold Glider/ WaveOne Gold Primary instrumentation group. No difference was found between the different access cavity design groups in combination with TruNatomy Glider/TruNatomy Prime preparation. Conclusion: Preparation time with TruNatomy Glider and Prime instruments was significantly faster than WaveOne Gold Glider/WaveOne Gold Primary, regardless of the access cavity design. TAC design in combination with WaveOne Gold Glider/ WaveOne Gold Primary instrumentation resulted in faster preparation time compared to WaveOne Gold Glider/WaveOne Gold in combination with the CAC design.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Endodonticsen_US
dc.subjectCanal preparation time; TruNatomy; WaveOne Gold; conservative access cavity; traditional access cavityen_US
dc.titleThe Effect of Different Molar Access Cavity Designs on Root Canal Shaping Times Using Rotation and Reciprocation Instruments in Mandibular First Molarsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Pretoriaen_US
dc.subject.categoryMedical Engineeringen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countrySouth Africaen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2022.03.011en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35398439-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85130410352-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85130410352-
dc.relation.issue7en_US
dc.relation.volume48en_US
cut.common.academicyearemptyen_US
dc.identifier.spage887en_US
dc.identifier.epage892en_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-6891-7064-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

26
Last Week
14
Last month
checked on Nov 6, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.