Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3294
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Virender Kumar-
dc.contributor.authorTriantis, T.M.-
dc.contributor.authorHe, Xuexiang-
dc.contributor.authorPelaez, Miguel A.-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Changseok-
dc.contributor.authorSong, Weihua-
dc.contributor.authorO’Shea, Kevin E.-
dc.contributor.authorKaloudis, Triantafyllos-
dc.contributor.authorHiskia, Anastasia E.-
dc.contributor.authorDionysiou, Dionysios Demetriou D.-
dc.contributor.authorDe La Cruz, Armah A.-
dc.contributor.authorAntoniou, Maria G.-
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-17T11:48:44Zen
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-17T07:13:11Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T07:52:30Z-
dc.date.available2013-01-17T11:48:44Zen
dc.date.available2013-05-17T07:13:11Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-08T07:52:30Z-
dc.date.issued2012-05-03-
dc.identifier.citationSeparation and Purification Technology, 2012, vol. 91, pp. 3-17en_US
dc.identifier.issn13835866-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3294-
dc.description.abstractCyanobacteria blooms pose an environmental hazard because of the release of water soluble toxic compounds, called cyanotoxins. Microcystins (MCs), hepatotoxic cyclic peptide toxins, are the most widespread cyanotoxins with microcystin-LR (MC-LR) the most common and toxic variant. Health effects of MCs have resulted in the need of using efficient treatment methods for the removal of this class of toxins in water supplies. While physical treatment methods can remove MCs at full or some extent from contaminated water, their function is primary separation of the whole toxins as intact molecules and further processing is required. On the other hand, chemical oxidation processes are a promising alternative treatment option due to the potential of complete destruction of the MCs, transformation to less toxic by-products, and even complete mineralization. MCs reactivity towards different conventional oxidants is strongly affected by water quality parameters like pH, DOC and oxidant dose. Although there is a general trend for MCs oxidation (ozone > permanganate > chlorine >>> chlorine-based oxidants), the selection of the appropriate oxidant for toxin elimination during water treatment should be assessed for each particular source of water. Although advanced oxidation processes are generally more effective on MCs degradation than conventional oxidation processes, scale-up studies are needed before these methods are considered as economically-feasible and practical sustainable alternatives in water treatment facilities. In this review, recent literature concerning treatment of MCs in water by conventional and advanced oxidation processes are reviewed and discussed in terms of the degree of degradation, reaction kinetics, identity and toxicity of oxidation by-products and possible degradation pathways.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSeparation and Purification Technologyen_US
dc.rights© 2011 Elsevieren_US
dc.subjectMicrocystinsen_US
dc.subjectCyanobacteriaen_US
dc.subjectOxidationen_US
dc.subjectWater qualityen_US
dc.subjectChlorineen_US
dc.titleDestruction of Microcystins by Conventional and Advanced Oxidation Processes: a Reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationFlorida Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationNational Center for Scientific Research Demokritosen_US
dc.collaborationTechnical University of Denmarken_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Cincinnatien_US
dc.collaborationFudan Universityen_US
dc.collaborationFlorida International Universityen_US
dc.collaborationOffice of Research and Developmenten_US
dc.collaborationAthens Water Supply and Sewerage Company (EYDAP SA)en_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryEnvironmental Engineeringen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.reviewpeer reviewed-
dc.countryUnited Statesen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.countryDenmarken_US
dc.countryChinaen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldNatural Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.seppur.2012.02.018en_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/77en
dc.relation.volume91en_US
cut.common.academicyear2011-2012en_US
dc.identifier.spage3en_US
dc.identifier.epage17en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Chemical Engineering-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0738-6068-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

174
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

159
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 20

468
Last Week
3
Last month
11
checked on May 9, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.