Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/32865
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorManiou, Theodora A.-
dc.contributor.authorPapa, Venetia-
dc.contributor.authorBantimaroudis, Philemon-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-13T08:15:10Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-13T08:15:10Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-01-
dc.identifier.citationMedia Watch, 2020, vol.11, no.3, pp. 386-400en_US
dc.identifier.issn09760911-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/32865-
dc.description.abstractThis experiment was designed to explore people’s critical, differentiating capacity between actual news and content that looks like news. Four groups of post-millennials read four versions of a news story. While the first condition included a real news story derived from a mainstream medium, the other three conditions tested three attributes of fakeness, namely an exaggerated, satirical, and popularised frame of disinformation. Although readers differentiated between satire and the actual news story, no significant differences were observed between exaggerated and simplified versions of news and the actual news story. Additional intervening variables were scrutinized, showing a connection between the salience of a story and its perceptions of fakeness.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedia Watchen_US
dc.subjectSalienceen_US
dc.subjectFake newsen_US
dc.subjectAgenda-settingen_US
dc.subjectDisinformationen_US
dc.subjectPost-millennialsen_US
dc.titleThe salience of fakeness: Experimental evidence on readers’ distinction between mainstream media content and altered news storiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Cyprusen_US
dc.subject.categoryMedia and Communicationsen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.15655/mw/2020/v11i3/202927en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85095126971-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85095126971-
dc.relation.issue3en_US
dc.relation.volume11en_US
cut.common.academicyear2020-2021en_US
dc.identifier.spage386en_US
dc.identifier.epage400en_US
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Communication and Internet Studies-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-6742-5172-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

22
Last Week
3
Last month
checked on Oct 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.