Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/32811
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArtelt, André-
dc.contributor.authorGregoriades, Andreas-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-22T05:57:29Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-22T05:57:29Z-
dc.date.issued2024-07-01-
dc.identifier.citationDecision Support Systems, 2024, vol 182 ,en_US
dc.identifier.issn01679236-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/32811-
dc.description.abstractImproving customer repurchase intention constitutes a key activity for maintaining sustainable business performance. Returning customers provide many economic and other benefits to businesses. In contrast, attracting new customers is a process that is associated with high costs. This work proposes a novel counterfactual explanations methodology that utilizes textual data from electronic word of mouth to recommend business changes that can improve customers' repurchase behavior. Counterfactual explanation methods gained considerable attention because their logic aligns with human reasoning and the fact that they can recommend low-cost actions on how to turn an unfavorable outcome into a favorable. Most counterfactual explanation methods however recommend actions that can change the outcome of individual instances (i.e. one customer) rather than a group of instances. Therefore, this work proposes a multi-instance counterfactual explanation method that recommends optimum changes to an organization's practices/policies that increase repurchase intention for many customers or customer segments. The proposed methodology utilizes topic modeling to extract customer opinions from online reviews' text and use topics as features to train a binary classifier that predicts customer revisit intention. Multi-instance counterfactual explanations are computed for all or different groups of non-revisiting customers, recommending optimum business changes that can increase revisit intention. The proposed methodology is empirically evaluated through a case study on the restaurant revisit problem and compared against a prominent alternative from the literature. The results show that the method has better performance to the alternative method and produces recommendations that are actionable and abide by the customer-repurchase literature.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofDecision Support Systemsen_US
dc.rights2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserveden_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectContrastive explanation methods for XAIen_US
dc.subjectCounterfactual explanationsen_US
dc.subjectCustomer repurchaseen_US
dc.subjectExplainable AIen_US
dc.subjectMachine learningen_US
dc.titleSupporting organizational decisions on How to improve customer repurchase using multi-instance counterfactual explanationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Bielefelden_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryMechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryGermanyen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.dss.2024.114249en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85194306018-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85194306018-
dc.relation.volume182en_US
cut.common.academicyearemptyen_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.journal.journalissn0167-9236-
crisitem.journal.publisherElsevier-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Management, Entrepreneurship and Digital Business-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Tourism Management, Hospitality and Entrepreneurship-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-7422-1514-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Tourism Management, Hospitality and Entrepreneurship-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

52
Last Week
0
Last month
8
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons