Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/32788
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlfian, Sofa D-
dc.contributor.authorSania, Jihan A-
dc.contributor.authorAini, Dzulfah Q-
dc.contributor.authorKhoiry, Qisty A-
dc.contributor.authorGriselda, Meliana-
dc.contributor.authorAusi, Yudisia-
dc.contributor.authorZakiyah, Neily-
dc.contributor.authorPuspitasari, Irma M-
dc.contributor.authorSuwantika, Auliya A-
dc.contributor.authorMahfud, Mariska-
dc.contributor.authorAji, Saktian-
dc.contributor.authorAbdulah, Rizky-
dc.contributor.authorKassianos, Angelos P.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-20T06:19:08Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-20T06:19:08Z-
dc.date.issued2024-05-21-
dc.identifier.citationBMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024, vol. 24, no. 1en_US
dc.identifier.issn1472-6947-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/32788-
dc.description.abstractIn Indonesia, the adoption of telepharmacy was propelled by the COVID-19 pandemic, prompting the need for a user-friendly application to support both the general population and pharmacists in accessing healthcare services. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate usability and user feedback of a pioneering telepharmacy application known as Tanya Obat (translating to "Ask about Medications") in Indonesia, from the perspectives of the general population and pharmacists. A mixed-methods sequential study was conducted with the early-stage Tanya Obat application in Bandung City. Participants, including the general population and pharmacists, were instructed to use the application for a week. Questionnaires for the general population and pharmacists were distributed from March to May and February to June 2023, respectively. The System Usability Scale questionnaire was adopted to describe usability of the developed application. Further exploration of the quantitative results required collecting open-ended feedback to assess the impressions of the participants, difficulties encountered, and desired features for enhanced user-friendliness. The collected statements were summarized and clustered using thematic analysis. Subsequently, the association between the characteristics of participants and perceived usability was determined with the Chi-square test. A total of 176 participants, comprising 100 individuals from the general population and 76 pharmacists, engaged in this study. In terms of usability, the questionnaire showed that Tanya Obat application was on the borderline of acceptability, with mean scores of 63.4 and 64.1 from the general population and pharmacists, respectively. Additionally, open-ended feedback targeted at achieving a more compelling user experience was categorized into two themes, including concerns regarding the functionality of certain features and recommendations for improved visual aesthetics and bug fixes. No significant associations were observed between the characteristics of participants and perceived usability (p-value > 0.05). The results showed that the perceived usability of Tanya Obat developed for telepharmacy was below average. Therefore, feature optimizations should be performed to facilitate usability of this application in Indonesia.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMC medical informatics and decision makingen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectIndonesiaen_US
dc.subjectMobile applicationen_US
dc.subjectTelemedicineen_US
dc.subjectUser-centered designen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of usability and user feedback to guide telepharmacy application development in Indonesia: a mixed-methods studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationUniversitas Padjadjaranen_US
dc.collaborationDienggo Kreasi Nusantara Companyen_US
dc.subject.categoryChemical Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryIndonesiaen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12911-024-02494-3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid38773562-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85193906760-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85193906760-
dc.relation.issue1en_US
dc.relation.volume24en_US
cut.common.academicyear2024-2025en_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6428-2623-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
s12911-024-02494-3.pdf1.73 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

53
Last Week
1
Last month
18
checked on Dec 25, 2024

Download(s) 50

50
checked on Dec 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons