Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/32679
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMamai, W-
dc.contributor.authorBueno-Masso, O-
dc.contributor.authorWallner, Markus-
dc.contributor.authorNikièma, S A-
dc.contributor.authorMeletiou, Sotiris-
dc.contributor.authorDeng, L-
dc.contributor.authorBalestrino, F-
dc.contributor.authorYamada, H-
dc.contributor.authorBouyer, J-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-15T07:52:04Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-15T07:52:04Z-
dc.date.issued2024-04-22-
dc.identifier.citationScientific Reports, 2024, vol. 14 n.1en_US
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/32679-
dc.description.abstractThis study provides a comparative analysis of two state-of-the-art automatic mosquito pupae sex sorters currently available: the ORINNO and the WOLBAKI Biotech pupae sex separation systems, which both exploit the sexual size dimorphism of pupae. In Aedes aegypti, the WOLBAKI sex sorter and the ORINNO with a sieve mesh size of 1.050 mm achieved sex separation with female contamination rates below 1%, low pupae mortality rates and high male flight capacity. However, in Ae. albopictus, there was more variability, with female contamination rates above the 1% threshold and pupae mortality reaching 27% when using the ORINNO sorter. On the other hand, the WOLBAKI sorter achieved a male pupae recovery of 47.99 ± 8.81% and 50.91 ± 11.77% in Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus, respectively, while the ORINNO sorter with a smaller sieve size achieved male pupae recoveries of 38.08 ± 9.69% and 40.16 ± 2.73% in Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus, respectively. This study provides valuable information for researchers and practitioners in the field, assisting in the selection of the most suitable system for mosquito control, management and research programs depending on their specific requirements.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofScientific Reportsen_US
dc.titleEfficiency assessment of a novel automatic mosquito pupae sex separation system in support of area-wide male-based release strategiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCentre of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agricultureen_US
dc.collaborationInstitut de Recherche Agricoleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agencyen_US
dc.collaborationCampus International de Baillargueten_US
dc.subject.categoryNATURAL SCIENCESen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryAustriaen_US
dc.countrySingaporeen_US
dc.countryFranceen_US
dc.subject.fieldNatural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-024-58067-xen_US
dc.identifier.pmid38649700-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85190863648-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85190863648-
dc.relation.issue1en_US
dc.relation.volume14en_US
cut.common.academicyearemptyen_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.journalissn2045-2322-
crisitem.journal.publisherSpringer Nature-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-3766-7098-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
Efficiency assessment of a novel.pdf1.96 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

48
Last Week
0
Last month
7
checked on Nov 6, 2024

Download(s)

34
checked on Nov 6, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.