Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/32526
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPantelidis, Lysandros-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T08:56:59Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-12T08:56:59Z-
dc.date.issued2024-05-04-
dc.identifier.citationArabian Journal of Geosciences, 2024, vol. 17, article number 169en_US
dc.identifier.issn18667511-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/32526-
dc.description.abstractThe ongoing refnement of bearing capacity equations remains pivotal in soil mechanics and foundation engineering, refecting its critical role in ensuring design efcacy and construction safety. This study conducts a thorough evaluation of classical bearing capacity methods—Terzaghi, Meyerhof, Vesic, and Hansen—and methods included in various design standards, such as EN1997:2004, prEN1997:2023, GEO, AASHTO, FHWA, and API. It explores the performance and applicability of these approaches, identifying areas for potential improvement. In response to identifed challenges, the paper proposes the integration of a unifed depth factor. This new factor is designed to be applicable across all N-terms, providing a more versatile and accurate tool for bearing capacity predictions. Unlike the original depth factors unique to each method, which may not fully address complex soil and footing conditions, the unifed depth factor is developed to enhance prediction accuracy for a wide range of conditions, including both fexible and rigid footings under varying fow rules (ψ=0 and ψ=φ). This depth factor corrects for modeling errors, emphasizing the importance of pairing the correct set of N-factors with their corresponding depth factor. By ofering a singular depth factor that aligns with the outcomes of fnite element analysis, this paper not only simplifes the computational process but also enhances the accuracy of bearing capacity predictions across a diverse range of soil conditions and footing types. The comparative analysis, based on fnite element analysis, validates the proposed method’s efectiveness, showcasing its potential to signifcantly refne foundation design practices by comparing it with both traditional and newly developed depth factors.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofArabian Journal of Geosciencesen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectBearing capacityen_US
dc.subjectStrip footingsen_US
dc.subjectNon-associated fow ruleen_US
dc.subjectAssociated fow ruleen_US
dc.subjectUnifed depth factoren_US
dc.subjectRigid and fexible footingsen_US
dc.titleBearing capacity of shallow foundations: a focus on the depth factors in combination with the respective N-factorsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12517-024-11976-7en_US
dc.relation.volume17en_US
cut.common.academicyear2024-2025en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-5979-6937-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Bearing capacity of shallow foundations..._open access_2024.pdfOpen Access4.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

37
Last Week
6
Last month
checked on Jul 25, 2024

Download(s)

28
checked on Jul 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons