Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/30754
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKoukouli, Maria Elissavet-
dc.contributor.authorZara, Marina-
dc.contributor.authorLerot, Christophe-
dc.contributor.authorFragkos, Konstantinos-
dc.contributor.authorBalis, Dimitris S.-
dc.contributor.authorvan Roozendael, Michel-
dc.contributor.authorAllart, Marcus Antonius Franciscus-
dc.contributor.authorVan Der A, Ronald Johannes-
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-08T06:57:12Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-08T06:57:12Z-
dc.date.issued2016-05-09-
dc.identifier.citationAtmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2016, vol. 9, iss. 5, pp. 2055 - 2065en_US
dc.identifier.issn18671381-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/30754-
dc.description.abstractThe main aim of the paper is to demonstrate an approach for post-processing of the Dobson spectrophotometers' total ozone columns (TOCs) in order to compensate for their known stratospheric effective temperature (Teff) dependency and its resulting effect on the usage of the Dobson TOCs for satellite TOCs' validation. The Dobson observations employed are those routinely submitted to the World Ozone and Ultraviolet Data Centre (WOUDC) of the World Meteorological Organization, whereas the effective temperatures have been extracted from two sources: the European Space Agency, ESA, Ozone Climate Change Initiative, Ozone-CCI, GODFIT version 3 (GOME-type Direct FITting) algorithm applied to the GOME2/MetopA, GOME2A, observations as well as the one derived from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) outputs. Both temperature sources are evaluated utilizing co-located ozonesonde measurements also retrieved from the WOUDC database. Both GODFIT-v3 and ECMWF Teffs are found to be unbiased against the ozonesonde observations and to agree with high correlation coefficients, especially for latitudes characterized by high seasonal variability in Teff. The validation analysis shows that, when applying the GODFIT-v3 effective temperatures in order to post-process the Dobson TOC, the mean difference between Dobson and GOME2A GODFIT-v3 TOCs moves from 0.63 ± 0.66 to 0.26 ± 0.46 % in the Northern Hemisphere and from 1.25 ± 1.20 to 0.80 ± 0.71 % in the Southern Hemisphere. The existing solar zenith angle dependency of the differences has been smoothed out, with near-zero dependency up to the 60-65° bin and the highest deviation decreasing from 2.38 ± 6.6 to 1.37 ± 6.4 % for the 80-85° bin. We conclude that the global-scale validation of satellite TOCs against collocated Dobson measurements benefits from a post-correction using suitably estimated Teffs.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAtmospheric Measurement Techniquesen_US
dc.rights© Author(s)en_US
dc.subjectEuropeen_US
dc.subjectEragrostis tefen_US
dc.subjectair temperatureen_US
dc.subjectalgorithmen_US
dc.subjectGOMEen_US
dc.subjectmodel validationen_US
dc.subjectNorthern Hemisphereen_US
dc.subjectozoneen_US
dc.subjectozonesondeen_US
dc.subjectsatellite dataen_US
dc.subjectseasonal variationen_US
dc.subjectSouthern Hemisphereen_US
dc.subjectspectrophotometryen_US
dc.subjecttotal ozoneen_US
dc.subjectzenith angleen_US
dc.titleThe impact of the ozone effective temperature on satellite validation using the Dobson spectrophotometer networken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationAristotle University of Thessalonikien_US
dc.collaborationBelgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB)en_US
dc.collaborationKoninklijk Nederlands Meteorologisch Instituuten_US
dc.subject.categoryNATURAL SCIENCESen_US
dc.subject.categoryENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGYen_US
dc.subject.categoryCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.countryBelgiumen_US
dc.countryNetherlandsen_US
dc.subject.fieldNatural Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/amt-9-2055-2016en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84969706678en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84969706678en
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#en
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#en
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#en
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#en
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#en
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#en
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#en
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#en
dc.relation.issue5en_US
dc.relation.volume9en_US
cut.common.academicyear2022-2023en_US
dc.identifier.spage2055en_US
dc.identifier.epage2065en_US
item.openairetypearticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3009-2407-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1867-8548-
crisitem.journal.publisherCopernicus-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 20

12
checked on Mar 14, 2024

Page view(s)

104
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Dec 4, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.