Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/30069
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGemenis, Kostas-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-28T06:57:22Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-28T06:57:22Z-
dc.date.issued2018-12-01-
dc.identifier.citationStatistics, Politics and Policy, 2018, vol. 9, iss. 2, pp. 161 - 179en_US
dc.identifier.issn21946299-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/30069-
dc.description.abstractA new aspect of electoral campaigns in Europe, and increasingly elsewhere as well, has been the proliferation of the online voter information tools, widely known in the political science community as Voting Advice Applications (VAAs). By accessing VAAs, users are provided with information about the degree of congruence between their policy preferences and those of different parties or candidates. Although the exact mechanisms have not been rigorously investigated, a series of studies across European countries, such as Finland, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Switzerland have demonstrated a link between the use of VAAs and electoral turnout. The aim of this paper is to contribute to this growing literature by analyzing previously untapped data from Greece, extending the empirical literature to a country where VAA effects have not been investigated before. The analysis indicates that the effect of VAAs in Greece is marginal to non-existent while there seems to be no evidence of the hypothesized information mechanism which purportedly drives such effects. The paper concludes with suggestions that future studies of VAA effects on turnout can address in their design.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofStatistics, Politics and Policyen_US
dc.rights© Walter de Gruyteren_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectVoting Advice Applicationsen_US
dc.titleThe Impact of Voting Advice Applications on Electoral Turnout: Evidence from Greeceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationMax Planck Institute for the Study of Societiesen_US
dc.subject.categoryMedia and Communicationsen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryGermanyen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/spp-2018-0011en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85093669967-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85093669967-
dc.relation.issue2en_US
dc.relation.volume9en_US
cut.common.academicyear2018-2019en_US
dc.identifier.spage161en_US
dc.identifier.epage179en_US
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Communication and Internet Studies-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3973-5675-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.journal.journalissn2151-7509-
crisitem.journal.publisherDe Gruyter-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 20

9
checked on Mar 14, 2024

Page view(s) 20

123
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Feb 2, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons