Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/30068
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGemenis, Kostas-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-28T06:26:25Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-28T06:26:25Z-
dc.date.issued2021-06-
dc.identifier.citationSwiss Political Science Review, 2021, vol. 27, iss. 2, pp. 229 - 242en_US
dc.identifier.issn14247755-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/30068-
dc.description.abstractPublic opinion on COVID-19 provides new empirical evidence for the debate on the ideological contours of conspiracy theories. I report findings from a web survey in Greece where participants were recruited via paid advertising on Facebook and the study sample was adjusted for age, gender, education, domicile, and region of residence using a nationally representative reference sample. I find that beliefs about conspiracy theories are more correlated than the values associated with established political ideologies, and that conspiracy beliefs and scepticism about the pandemic are best explained by belief in unrelated political and medical conspiracy theories. No other demographic or attitudinal variable has such a strong influence, and the results are robust to different statistical specifications. In comparison, the effect of ideology measured by left-right self-placement is rather negligible and further moderated by trust in government. The results have implications for the strategies aimed at fighting disinformation during public health emergencies.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSwiss Political Science Reviewen_US
dc.rights© The Authorsen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectConspiracy beliefsen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19 pandemicen_US
dc.subjectPolitical attitudesen_US
dc.titleExplaining Conspiracy Beliefs and Scepticism around the COVID-19 Pandemicen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationMax Planck Institute for the Study of Societiesen_US
dc.subject.categorySocial and Economic Geographyen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryGermanyen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/spsr.12467en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35923362-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85107798638-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85107798638-
dc.relation.issue2en_US
dc.relation.volume27en_US
cut.common.academicyear2020-2021en_US
dc.identifier.spage229en_US
dc.identifier.epage242en_US
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Communication and Internet Studies-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3973-5675-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Swiss Political Sci Review - 2021 - Gemenis.pdfFull text469.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 50

11
checked on Feb 2, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 50

126
Last Week
0
Last month
5
checked on Jan 30, 2025

Download(s) 50

64
checked on Jan 30, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons