Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29984
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFyndanis, Valantis-
dc.contributor.authorMasoura, Elvira-
dc.contributor.authorMalefaki, Sonia-
dc.contributor.authorChatziadamou, Efpraxia-
dc.contributor.authorDosi, Ifigeneia-
dc.contributor.authorCaplan, David-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-26T08:27:18Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-26T08:27:18Z-
dc.date.issued2022-07-14-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Psychology, 2022, vol. 13en_US
dc.identifier.issn16641078-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29984-
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the relationship between verb-related morphosyntactic production (VRMP) and locality (i.e., critical cue being adjacent to the target or not), verbal Working Memory (vWM), nonverbal/visuospatial WM (nvWM), verbal short-term memory (vSTM), nonverbal/visuospatial STM (nvSTM), speed of processing, and education. Eighty healthy middle-aged and older Greek-speaking participants were administered a sentence completion task tapping into production of subject-verb Agreement, Time Reference/Tense, and grammatical Aspect in local and nonlocal configurations, and cognitive tasks tapping into vSTM, nvSTM, vWM, nvWM, and speed of processing. Aspect elicited worse performance than Time Reference and Agreement, and Time Reference elicited worse performance than Agreement. There were main effects of vSTM, vWM, education, and locality: the greater the participants' vSTM/vWM capacity, and the higher their educational level, the better their VRMP; nonlocal configurations elicited worse performance on VRMP than local configurations. Moreover, vWM affected Aspect and Time Reference/Tense more than Agreement, and education affected VRMP more in local than in nonlocal configurations. Lastly, locality affected Agreement and Aspect (with nonlocal configurations eliciting more agreement and aspect errors than local configurations) but not Time Reference. That vSTM/vWM (but not nvSTM/nvWM) were found to subserve VRMP suggests that VRMP is predominantly supported by domain-specific, not by domain-general, memory resources. The main effects of vWM and vSTM suggest that both the processing and storage components of WM are relevant to VRMP. That vWM (but not vSTM) interacts with production of Aspect, Time Reference, and Agreement suggests that Aspect and Time Reference are computationally more demanding than Agreement. These findings are consistent with earlier findings that, in individuals with aphasia, vWM interacts with production of Aspect, Time Reference, and Agreement. The differential effect of education on VRMP in local vs. nonlocal configurations could be accounted for by assuming that education is a proxy for an assumed procedural memory system that is sensitive to frequency patterns in language and better supports VRMP in more frequent than in less frequent configurations. In the same vein, the interaction between locality and the three morphosyntactic categories might reflect the statistical distribution of local vs. nonlocal Aspect, Agreement, and Time Reference/Tense in Greek.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights© by the authorsen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjecteducationen_US
dc.subjectgrammatical aspecten_US
dc.subjectmorphosyntactic productionen_US
dc.subjectshort-term memoryen_US
dc.subjectspeed of processingen_US
dc.subjectsubject–verb agreementen_US
dc.subjecttime reference/tenseen_US
dc.subjectworking memoryen_US
dc.titleThe Role of Working Memory, Short-Term Memory, Speed of Processing, Education, and Locality in Verb-Related Morphosyntactic Production: Evidence From Greeken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Osloen_US
dc.collaborationAristotle University of Thessalonikien_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Patrasen_US
dc.collaborationDemocritus University of Thraceen_US
dc.collaborationMassachusetts General Hospitalen_US
dc.subject.categoryHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryNorwayen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.countryUnited Statesen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2022.851440en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35911026-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85135034547-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85135034547-
dc.relation.volume13en_US
cut.common.academicyear2021-2022en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9403-3468-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4911-2049-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
fyndanis 1.pdfFull text2.22 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Mar 20, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

200
Last Week
1
Last month
30
checked on Mar 11, 2025

Download(s)

58
checked on Mar 11, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons