Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29966
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTsiplakou, Eleni-
dc.contributor.authorPitino, Rosario-
dc.contributor.authorManuelian, Carmen L-
dc.contributor.authorSimoni, Marica-
dc.contributor.authorMitsiopoulou, Christina-
dc.contributor.authorDe Marchi, Massimo-
dc.contributor.authorRighi, Federico-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-25T08:23:55Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-25T08:23:55Z-
dc.date.issued2021-05-14-
dc.identifier.citationAntioxidants, 2021, vol. 10, iss. 5en_US
dc.identifier.issn20763921-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29966-
dc.description.abstractThe interest for safe and natural foods of animal origin is currently increasing the use of plant feed additives (PFA) as antioxidants in animal nutrition. However, studies with livestock animals dealing with PFA as antioxidants are scarce. The aim of the present review was to evaluate the antioxidant impact of PFA compared with synthetic vitamins on animal food product yield and quality. For this purpose, peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2020 were collected. Most papers were carried out on ruminants (n = 13), but PFA were also tested in swine (n = 6) and rabbits (n = 2). The inclusion of PFA in the diets of pigs, rabbits, and ruminants improved the products' quality (including organoleptic characteristics and fatty acids profile), oxidative stability, and shelf life, with some impacts also on their yields. The effects of PFA are diverse but often comparable to those of the synthetic antioxidant vitamin E, suggesting their potential as an alternative to this vitamin within the diet.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights© by the authorsen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectOrganic livestocken_US
dc.subjectPlant extractsen_US
dc.subjectRuminantsen_US
dc.subjectSwineen_US
dc.subjectTocopherolsen_US
dc.subjectVitaminsen_US
dc.titlePlant Feed Additives as Natural Alternatives to the Use of Synthetic Antioxidant Vitamins in Livestock Animal Products Yield, Quality, and Oxidative Status: A Reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationAgricultural University of Athensen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Parmaen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Padovaen_US
dc.subject.categoryEnvironmental Biotechnologyen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/antiox10050780en_US
dc.identifier.pmid34069000-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85105722562-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85105722562-
dc.relation.issue5en_US
dc.relation.volume10en_US
cut.common.academicyear2021-2022en_US
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9369-5192-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
mitsiopoulou 2.pdfFull text240.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

17
checked on Feb 2, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

182
Last Week
1
Last month
3
checked on Jan 30, 2025

Download(s)

88
checked on Jan 30, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons