Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29958
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBattisti, Enrico-
dc.contributor.authorNirino, Niccolò-
dc.contributor.authorLeonidou, Erasmia-
dc.contributor.authorSalvi, Antonio-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-24T10:55:53Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-24T10:55:53Z-
dc.date.issued2023-07-01-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Business Research, 2023, vol. 162en_US
dc.identifier.issn01482963-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29958-
dc.description.abstractDrawing on the stewardship theory (ST) and socio-emotional wealth (SEW) perspective, this study investigates the role of sustainable activities within family firms (FFs) and the effect of marketing strategic decisions in improving their corporate social responsibility performance. To achieve the research aims, we analysed a sample of 730 American and European listed companies from 2015 to 2020. The results show that family businesses are more socially responsible than non-family businesses due to the presence of stewards. However, strategic marketing decisions have unclear effects in achieving these outcomes. This study expands the literature on ST and SEW in FFs, integrating them with sustainable principles. We also contribute to the sustainability debate and marketing literature related to FFs.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights© Elsevier Inc.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectCorporate communicationen_US
dc.subjectCSR performanceen_US
dc.subjectFamily firmsen_US
dc.subjectSocio-emotional wealthen_US
dc.subjectStewardship theoryen_US
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_US
dc.titleCorporate social responsibility in family firms: Can corporate communication affect CSR performance?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Turinen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Nicosiaen_US
dc.subject.categoryMedia and Communicationsen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryItalyen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113865en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85151398767-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85151398767-
dc.relation.volume162en_US
cut.common.academicyear2022-2023en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Communication and Marketing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 20

6
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 20

134
Last Week
3
Last month
12
checked on Jul 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons