Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29811
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChrysargyris, Antonios-
dc.contributor.authorPetropoulos, Spyridon A.-
dc.contributor.authorTzortzakis, Nikos G.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-12T10:15:12Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-12T10:15:12Z-
dc.date.issued2022-03-01-
dc.identifier.citationAgronomy, 2022, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1-17en_US
dc.identifier.issn20734395-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29811-
dc.description.abstractThe ongoing climate crisis necessitates the sustainable use of natural resources and the adop-tion of environmentally friendly agronomic practices. Deficit irrigation is an ecofriendly technique that allows for the improvement in the water use efficiency of crops. On the other hand, medicinal and aromatic crops, which usually have an innate tolerance to harsh conditions, are suitable candidates for cultivation under low-input cropping systems. In the present study, Melissa officinalis plants were cultivated under conventional and organic cropping systems, while in each system two irrigation regimes (full irrigation or deficit irrigation) were tested. The aerial parts of the plants were evaluated in terms of growth and physiological parameters, chemical composition, antioxidant activity, essential oil yield and essential oil composition. Our results indicate that prolonged water stress after two deficit irrigation cycles had detrimental effects on the plant growth and biomass production, whereas it significantly increased the essential oil yield, regardless of the cropping system (organic or conventional cultivation). The recorded physiological parameters are in agreement with morphological features, especially the stomatal conductance, which was significantly reduced under deficit irrigation for both cultivation systems, revealing that the growth inhibition was the result of stomatal closure and carbon dioxide deprivation. Deficit irrigation and organic cultivation also increased total phenol and total flavonoid content, especially in the second harvest, thus resulting in higher antioxidant activity assayed by the FRAP method. In contrast, DPPH and ABTS methods did not show any differences among the tested treatments in the second harvest, which suggests that other bioactive compounds are also involved in the overall antioxidant mechanism of lemon balm plants, as indicated by the increased ascorbic acid content. Regarding the essential oil composition, the major detected compounds were geranial and neral and, although they were both increased under the organic cropping in the first harvest, the same trend was not observed in the second harvest. Finally, a variable effect of cropping system and irrigation regime on minerals content was recorded. In conclusion, deficit irrigation is an ecofriendly practice that could be applied in conventional and organic cropping systems of lemon balm crops, aiming to reduce irrigation water consumption and compensate for reduced herb yields with increased essential oil yield and polyphenol content.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAgronomyen_US
dc.rights© by the authorsen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectMelissa officinalisen_US
dc.subjectOrganic cultivationen_US
dc.subjectWater deficiten_US
dc.subjectEssential oilsen_US
dc.subjectVolatile compoundsen_US
dc.subjectAntioxidant activityen_US
dc.subjectNutrient contenten_US
dc.titleEssential Oil Composition and Bioactive Properties of Lemon Balm Aerial Parts as Affected by Cropping System and Irrigation Regimeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Thessalyen_US
dc.subject.categoryAGRICULTURAL SCIENCESen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.subject.fieldAgricultural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/agronomy12030649en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85126458416-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85126458416-
dc.relation.issue3en_US
dc.relation.volume12en_US
cut.common.academicyear2021-2022en_US
dc.identifier.spage1en_US
dc.identifier.epage17en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn2073-4395-
crisitem.journal.publisherMDPI-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1067-7977-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2719-6627-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
agronomy-12-00649 (2).pdf1.04 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Nov 1, 2023

Page view(s)

131
Last Week
2
Last month
13
checked on May 14, 2024

Download(s) 50

64
checked on May 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons