Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29667
Title: Improving the Risk Assessment of Pesticides through the Integration of Human Biomonitoring and Food Monitoring Data: A Case Study for Chlorpyrifos
Authors: Tarazona, Jose V 
González-Caballero, Maria Del Carmen 
de Alba-Gonzalez, Mercedes 
Pedraza-Diaz, Susana 
Cañas, Ana 
Dominguez-Morueco, Noelia 
López, Marta Esteban 
Cattaneo, Irene 
Katsonouri, Andromachi 
Makris, Konstantinos C. 
Halldorsson, Thorhallur I 
Olafsdottir, Kristin 
Zock, Jan-Paul 
Dias, Jonatan 
De Decker, Annelies 
Morrens, Bert 
Berman, Tamar 
Barnett-Itzhaki, Zohar 
Lindh, Christian 
Gilles, Liese 
Govarts, Eva 
Schoeters, Greet 
Weber, Till 
Kolossa-Gehring, Marike 
Santonen, Tiina 
Castaño, Argelia 
Major Field of Science: Medical and Health Sciences
Field Category: Health Sciences
Keywords: chlorpyrifos;HBM4EU;human biomonitoring;pesticide exposure;pesticide risk assessment
Issue Date: 9-Jun-2022
Source: Toxics, 2022 vol. 10, iss. 6
Volume: 10
Issue: 6
Abstract: The risk assessment of pesticide residues in food is a key priority in the area of food safety. Most jurisdictions have implemented pre-marketing authorization processes, which are supported by prospective risk assessments. These prospective assessments estimate the expected residue levels in food combining results from residue trials, resembling the pesticide use patterns, with food consumption patterns, according to internationally agreed procedures. In addition, jurisdictions such as the European Union (EU) have implemented large monitoring programs, measuring actual pesticide residue levels in food, and are supporting large-scale human biomonitoring programs for confirming the actual exposure levels and potential risk for consumers. The organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos offers an interesting case study, as in the last decade, its acceptable daily intake (ADI) has been reduced several times following risk assessments by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). This process has been linked to significant reductions in the use authorized in the EU, reducing consumers' exposure progressively, until the final ban in 2020, accompanied by setting all EU maximum residue levels (MRL) in food at the default value of 0.01 mg/kg. We present a comparison of estimates of the consumer's internal exposure to chlorpyrifos based on the urinary marker 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol (TCPy), using two sources of monitoring data: monitoring of the food chain from the EU program and biomonitoring of European citizens from the HB4EU project, supported by a literature search. Both methods confirmed a drastic reduction in exposure levels from 2016 onwards. The margin of exposure approach is then used for conducting retrospective risk assessments at different time points, considering the evolution of our understanding of chlorpyrifos toxicity, as well as of exposure levels in EU consumers following the regulatory decisions. Concerns are presented using a color code, and have been identified for almost all studies, particularly for the highest exposed group, but at different levels, reaching the maximum level, red code, for children in Cyprus and Israel. The assessment uncertainties are highlighted and integrated in the identification of levels of concern.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29667
ISSN: 23056304
DOI: 10.3390/toxics10060313
Rights: © by the authors
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Type: Article
Affiliation : Instituto de Salud Carlos III 
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 
Cyprus Ministry of Health 
Cyprus University of Technology 
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
makris constantinos 7.pdfFull text1.79 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
checked on Feb 2, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Nov 1, 2023

Page view(s)

162
Last Week
0
Last month
5
checked on Dec 3, 2024

Download(s)

78
checked on Dec 3, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons