Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29608
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChristou, Eirini-
dc.contributor.authorParmaxi, Antigoni-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-04T06:46:14Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-04T06:46:14Z-
dc.date.issued2022-01-01-
dc.identifier.citationUniversal Access in the Information Society, 2022en_US
dc.identifier.issn16155289-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29608-
dc.description.abstractThis systematic literature review aims to collect and uncover the various types of tools and materials available—digital and traditional—for tackling gender equality in the fields of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). Considering the various facets of gender-equality, this review provides an overview of different tools and materials used in the wider academic and industrial community for supporting or empowering women to enrol or remain active in STEM fields. Published manuscripts between 2001 and 2021 were searched electronically with an eye to retrieve the relevant published literature on the topic. Traditional and digital gender-sensitive tools and materials were identified, classified and described together with their benefits and drawbacks. This review demonstrates the variety of gender-sensitive materials and tools employed in higher education institutions to empower women to enrol and remain active in the field of STEM. Industrial and instructional design recommendations were drawn from the review as well as implications for professionals and researchers.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights© Elsevier B.V.en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectGender equalityen_US
dc.subjectGender-sensitive materialen_US
dc.subjectGender-sensitive toolsen_US
dc.subjectWomen empowermenten_US
dc.titleGender-sensitive tools and materials for women empowerment in STEM: a systematic review with industrial and instructional recommendations and implicationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryEducational Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10209-022-00881-zen_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85132620152-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85132620152-
cut.common.academicyear2022-2023en_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.author.deptLanguage Centre-
crisitem.author.facultyLanguage Centre-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0687-0176-
crisitem.author.parentorgCyprus University of Technology-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 50

1
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Nov 1, 2023

Page view(s)

158
Last Week
0
Last month
25
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons