Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29531
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa-
dc.contributor.authorNizami, Abdul Sattar-
dc.contributor.authorKalogirou, Soteris A.-
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Vijai Kumar-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Young-Kwon-
dc.contributor.authorFallahi, Alireza-
dc.contributor.authorSulaiman, Alawi-
dc.contributor.authorRanjbari, Meisam-
dc.contributor.authorRahnama, Hassan-
dc.contributor.authorAghbashlo, Mortaza-
dc.contributor.authorPeng, Wanxi-
dc.contributor.authorTabatabaei, Meisam-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-28T09:11:09Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-28T09:11:09Z-
dc.date.issued2022-06-01-
dc.identifier.citationRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, vol. 161en_US
dc.identifier.issn13640321-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29531-
dc.description.abstractWaste cooking oil (WCO) disposal in landfills or discharge into sewer systems could cause severe environmental challenges. Therefore, extensive efforts are made to develop strategies for its effective management, aligned with circular bioeconomy and zero-discharge principles and the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals. Among existing strategies, converting WCO into biodiesel is promising; however, biodiesel production from this waste stream could induce many direct and indirect environmental impacts, which should be scrutinized using advanced sustainability assessment tools. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a powerful tool that can be applied to assess the environmental sustainability of WCO biodiesel production in comparison with diesel and first-generation biodiesel production. Accordingly, the present review aims to scrutinize the existing literature on the LCA analysis of WCO biodiesel production to shed light on the state-of-the-art of the application of this methodology in this domain, identify research gaps, and introduce future research opportunities. Although environmental assessment of biodiesel production by LCA is well-established, several limitations and concerns still exist. Overall, system boundaries have generally been clearly defined in the published literature; however, some studies have ignored waste management; for example, disposal of soap and other solid residues has usually been removed from the analysis. Furthermore, the “zero-burden assumption” applied to WCO (as biodiesel feedstock) in the published literature might not be a valid hypothesis since this waste stream could be a raw material for some other applications. At the inventory level, the inadequacy of the data, particularly information associated with the production of novel catalysts (including enzymes) and materials used for product purification, is also a problematic issue for the current and under development technologies used in WCO biodiesel production. Therefore, future studies should focus on decreasing the existing uncertainties mentioned throughout the present work. Moreover, efforts should be put into assessing the environmental impacts of WCO biodiesel production systems by employing innovative techniques, e.g., hydrodynamic cavitation reactors, integrating other renewable energy resources, and using green catalysts in the production and combustion stages of WCO biodiesel.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviewsen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © Elsevier B.V.en_US
dc.subjectWaste cooking oilen_US
dc.subjectUsed cooking oilen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental pollutionen_US
dc.subjectBiodiesel productionen_US
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectLife cycle assessmenten_US
dc.titleEnvironmental life cycle assessment of biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: A systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationHenan Agricultural Universityen_US
dc.collaborationGovernment College Universityen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationScotland's Rural College (SRUC)en_US
dc.collaborationSeoul National Universityen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Tehranen_US
dc.collaborationUniversiti Teknologi MARA 40450 Shah Alamen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Turinen_US
dc.collaborationAgricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII)en_US
dc.collaborationAgricultural Research, Extension, and Education Organization (AREEO)en_US
dc.collaborationHigher Education Center of Excellence (HICoE)en_US
dc.collaborationInstitute of Tropical Aquaculture Hatchery UMT (AKUATROP UMT)en_US
dc.collaborationUniversiti Malaysia Terengganuen_US
dc.subject.categoryMechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.journalsHybrid Open Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryChinaen_US
dc.countryMalaysiaen_US
dc.countryPakistanen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.countryIranen_US
dc.countryItalyen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rser.2022.112411en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85127529577-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85127529577-
dc.relation.volume161en_US
cut.common.academicyear2022-2023en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science and Engineering-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4497-0602-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 50

70
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

42
checked on Nov 1, 2023

Page view(s)

120
Last Week
2
Last month
10
checked on May 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.