Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29033
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPapakonstantinou, Apostolos-
dc.contributor.authorTopouzelis, Konstantinos-
dc.contributor.authorPavlogeorgatos, Gerasimos-
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-16T19:47:06Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-16T19:47:06Z-
dc.date.issued2016-06-
dc.identifier.citationISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2016, vol. 5, no. 6, articl. no. 75en_US
dc.identifier.issn22209964-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29033-
dc.description.abstractSpatial data acquisition is a critical process for the identification of the coastline and coastal zones for scientists involved in the study of coastal morphology. The availability of very high-resolution digital surface models (DSMs) and orthophoto maps is of increasing interest to all scientists, especially those monitoring small variations in the earth's surface, such as coastline morphology. In this article, we present a methodology to acquire and process high resolution data for coastal zones acquired by a vertical take off and landing (VTOL) unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) attached to a small commercial camera. The proposed methodology integrated computer vision algorithms for 3D representation with image processing techniques for analysis. The computer vision algorithms used the structure from motion (SfM) approach while the image processing techniques used the geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA) with fuzzy classification. The SfM pipeline was used to construct the DSMs and orthophotos with a measurement precision in the order of centimeters. Consequently, GEOBIA was used to create objects by grouping pixels that had the same spectral characteristics together and extracting statistical features from them. The objects produced were classified by fuzzy classification using the statistical features as input. The classification output classes included beach composition (sand, rubble, and rocks) and sub-surface classes (seagrass, sand, algae, and rocks). The methodology was applied to two case studies of coastal areas with different compositions: a sandy beach with a large face and a rubble beach with a small face. Both are threatened by beach erosion and have been degraded by the action of sea storms. Results show that the coastline, which is the low limit of the swash zone, was detected successfully by both the 3D representations and the image classifications. Furthermore, several traces representing previous sea states were successfully recognized in the case of the sandy beach, while the erosion and beach crests were detected in the case of the rubble beach. The achieved level of detail of the 3D representations revealed new beach characteristics, including erosion crests, berm zones, and sand dunes. In conclusion, the UAV SfM workflow provides information in a spatial resolution that permits the study of coastal changes with confidence and provides accurate 3D visualizations of the beach zones, even for areas with complex topography. The overall results show that the presented methodology is a robust tool for the classification, 3D visualization, and mapping of coastal morphology.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofISPRS International Journal of Geo-Informationen_US
dc.rights© by the authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution.en_US
dc.subject3D geovisualizationen_US
dc.subjectGEOBIAen_US
dc.subjectUAV data acquisitionen_US
dc.subjectCoastal mappingen_US
dc.subjectDigital surface modelen_US
dc.subjectStructure from motionen_US
dc.titleCoastline Zones Identification and 3D Coastal Mapping Using UAV Spatial Dataen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Aegeanen_US
dc.subject.categoryCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijgi5060075en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84971330929-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/5/6/75/htm http://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/5/6/75-
dc.relation.issue6en_US
dc.relation.volume5en_US
cut.common.academicyear2015-2016en_US
dc.identifier.external59954674-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-6464-2008-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.journal.journalissn2220-9964-
crisitem.journal.publisherMDPI-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
ijgi-05-00075.pdfFulltext9.74 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

108
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

88
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

169
Last Week
2
Last month
12
checked on Oct 5, 2024

Download(s)

118
checked on Oct 5, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.