Patient and Public Involvement in Stroke and Aphasia Research: a Thematic Analysis
Journal
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Date Issued
December 2022
DOI
10.1016/j.apmr.2022.08.815
Abstract
Research Objectives
To explore the views of people who live with chronic stroke and aphasia on their potential involvement as research partners.
Design
Qualitative study: semi-structured interviews. Participatory research model with a Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) partner: a person with chronic stroke-induced aphasia.
Setting
On line interviews (zoom).
Participants
Inclusion criteria:
(1)
to have experienced a stroke,
(2)
to be in the chronic stage of stroke (> 6 months post-stroke)
(3)
to speak, understand, read, and write English post-stroke
(4)
to be socially active as confirmed from the case history
(5)
to have at least one academic qualification, and
(6)
to have had previous research experience, whether as students or as researchers.
An additional inclusion criterion for PWA was to show evidence, from case history interviews, of mild-moderate chronic aphasia.
Participants
Eight people with chronic stroke, four with concomitant aphasia and four without.
Interventions
N/A.
Main Outcome Measures
A thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke 6-step framework. Implementation of outcomes on the International Classification of disability F framework.
Results
Inductive thematic analysis generated four themes:
(1)
the kinds of Restrictions that make involvement in research difficult,
(2)
the preferred levels and ways of Involvement during the research process,
(3)
the Support required for active and collaborative involvement, and
(4)
the Impact of their involvement and how it benefits the study's outcomes.
Conclusions
People living with chronic stroke and aphasia are willing to be involved in PPI stroke and aphasia studies, if researchers provide the necessary robust support environment. The findings provide new evidence about how patient partnership models can support people with chronic communication deficits to contribute meaningfully to co-produced research.
To explore the views of people who live with chronic stroke and aphasia on their potential involvement as research partners.
Design
Qualitative study: semi-structured interviews. Participatory research model with a Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) partner: a person with chronic stroke-induced aphasia.
Setting
On line interviews (zoom).
Participants
Inclusion criteria:
(1)
to have experienced a stroke,
(2)
to be in the chronic stage of stroke (> 6 months post-stroke)
(3)
to speak, understand, read, and write English post-stroke
(4)
to be socially active as confirmed from the case history
(5)
to have at least one academic qualification, and
(6)
to have had previous research experience, whether as students or as researchers.
An additional inclusion criterion for PWA was to show evidence, from case history interviews, of mild-moderate chronic aphasia.
Participants
Eight people with chronic stroke, four with concomitant aphasia and four without.
Interventions
N/A.
Main Outcome Measures
A thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke 6-step framework. Implementation of outcomes on the International Classification of disability F framework.
Results
Inductive thematic analysis generated four themes:
(1)
the kinds of Restrictions that make involvement in research difficult,
(2)
the preferred levels and ways of Involvement during the research process,
(3)
the Support required for active and collaborative involvement, and
(4)
the Impact of their involvement and how it benefits the study's outcomes.
Conclusions
People living with chronic stroke and aphasia are willing to be involved in PPI stroke and aphasia studies, if researchers provide the necessary robust support environment. The findings provide new evidence about how patient partnership models can support people with chronic communication deficits to contribute meaningfully to co-produced research.
Subjects