Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/27540
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMendez, Fernando-
dc.contributor.authorMendez, Mario-
dc.contributor.authorTriga, Vasiliki-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-07T16:15:47Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-07T16:15:47Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/27540-
dc.description.abstractIn paving the way for the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the second Irish referendum of October 2009 brought to an end a constitutional saga that had occupied EU elites for the best part of a decade. The institutional crisis had been provoked by the two negative popular votes in France and the Netherlands on a major treaty reform, the Constitutional Treaty. The crisis was exacerbated when the Irish electorate delivered a “no” vote in 2008 on the carefully repackaged version of the failed Constitutional Treaty, the Lisbon Treaty. The respite from the European Union (EU) constitutional odyssey was short-lived, however. Within months of the entry into force of the new constitutional settlement the EU was plunged into a financial crisis that threatened the future of its flagship policy, the single currency. The new Lisbon institutional machinery had been operative for barely a few months when the financial crisis exposed the serious inadequacies of its institutional arrangements for economic governance. The ensuing euro clash exposed a new cleavage between creditor and debtor euro partners as well the potential for a growing divergence between euro members and non-euro member states. Greece was to be the first, and most dramatic, case in a series of emergency “bail-outs” for euro member states afflicted by the financial crisis. During the critical negotiations for its second emergency “bail-out”–one of the many peaks of the Eurozone crisis–the Greek Prime Minister unexpectedly announced that, in addition to a parliamentary vote of confidence, a referendum would be held to legitimate the painful terms and conditions of the bail-out. The …en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleExcerpt More informationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Zurichen_US
dc.collaborationQueen Mary University of Londonen_US
dc.subject.categoryMedia and Communicationsen_US
dc.countrySwitzerlanden_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.urlhttps://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=1094649080129918444&hl=en&oi=scholarren
cut.common.academicyear2014-2015en_US
dc.identifier.externalOg_hYA4AAAAJ:7PzlFSSx8tACen
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Communication and Marketing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6932-5389-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 50

130
Last Week
1
Last month
5
checked on May 2, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.