Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/27538
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTrechsel, Alexander-
dc.contributor.authorKies, Raphael-
dc.contributor.authorMendez, Fernando-
dc.contributor.authorSchmitter, Philippe-
dc.contributor.authorTriga, Vasiliki-
dc.contributor.authorVulliez, Valérie-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-07T15:40:05Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-07T15:40:05Z-
dc.date.issued2003-
dc.identifier.citationC2D-Research and Documentation Centre on Direct Democracy, 2003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/27538-
dc.description.abstractThis report is about the one of the latest changes in the ‘technology of democracy’and how it may impact on some of our core institutions of democratic representation: parliaments and parties. As in the past, whenever something new was injected into the processes of election and representation pundits have emerged to argue that the nature of democracy would be transformed. This is no less true for one of the latest potential changes in the ‘technology of democracy’, namely the introduction into the democratic realm of information and communication technologies (ICT). This report evaluates whether the introduction and diffusion of ICT is having a significant impact upon the practice of democracy in the member and candidate states of the European Union. Two research strategies have been employed: The first is a comparative website analysis of parliamentary and political parties’ websites. The second is a series of case studies and country reports which focus on edemocracy initiatives across the 26 polities we survey. The results of our core empirical analysis indicate that there is considerable variation among both parliaments and parties as far as the development of their websites is concerned. Existing member states tend to have more developed websites and, overall, the quality of parliamentary websites tends to be slightly superior to that of party websites. Most surprisingly, familiarity and use of ICT–as well as higher levels of wealth-do not inexorably lead to better website development. Differences in party systems–its fragmentation, ideological orientation, levels of turnout, distribution of major and minor parties-also do not seem to have a …en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the new technologies in order to facilitate democracy in Europeen_US
dc.typeReporten_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Genevaen_US
dc.collaborationEuropean University Instituteen_US
dc.subject.categoryMedia and Communicationsen_US
dc.countryItalyen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.agora-parl.org/sites/default/files/agora-documents/EUIF-EG%20-%20Evaluation%20of%20the%20use%20of%20new%20technologies%20in%20order%20to%20facilitate%20democracy%20in%20Europe%20-%20EN%20-%20PI.pdfen
cut.common.academicyear2013-2014en_US
dc.identifier.externalOg_hYA4AAAAJ:aqlVkmm33-oCen
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_93fc-
item.openairetypereport-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Communication and Marketing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6932-5389-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 50

160
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.