Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/27383
Title: Economic Evaluation of New-type Energy Geo-structures in Residential Buildings. A Case Study in Moderate Mediterranean Climate
Authors: Aresti, Lazaros 
Christodoulides, Paul 
Stassis, Andreas 
Florides, Georgios A. 
Major Field of Science: Engineering and Technology
Field Category: Environmental Engineering
Keywords: Ground heat exchanger;Energy geo structures;Energy piles;Foundation bed GHE
Issue Date: Jun-2022
Source: 3rd Symposium on Circular Economy and Sustainability, 2022, 27-29 June, Chania, Greece
Conference: Symposium on Circular Economy and Sustainability 
Abstract: Shallow Geothermal Energy Systems (SGESs) are Renewable Energy Systems (RES), which are applied in the residential sector through the use of Ground Source Heat Pumps (GSHPs). GSHPs are coupled with Ground Heat Exchangers (GHEs), where heat is absorbed or rejected through a network of pipes in the ground. GSHPs have not yet thrived in the RES market because of their high initial costs and long payback periods. Two Energy Geo-Structure (EGS) systems, in specific the foundation (or energy) piles and the foundation bed of a residential building in moderate climate Mediterranean conditions in the island of Cyprus, were computationally modeled by Aresti et al. [1]. A theoretically typical house with nearly Zero Energy Building (nZEB) characteristics was examined, with estimated heating and cooling loads used as inputs to investigate the performance of the EGS-GSHP systems. Both systems were shown to exhibit steady performance and high Coefficient of Performance (COP) values, making them an alternative RES solution for integration in residential building. In this study the above-mentioned systems were evaluated economically by comparison with a conventional high- and low-performance Air Source Heat Pump (ASHP) systems. Although various methods could be used to evaluate the economic benefits of the systems, to simplify the study, only the difference in the cost of the two systems is used here through the Simple Payback Period (SPP) and the Discounted Payback Period (DPP) methods. The monthly loads and average monthly COP values of each system, as well as the lifespan and the cost of the HP replacement were considered. It is noted that the costs related to grout filling and the borehole extraction are not included, as in any case the buildings foundations would be constructed, therefore no cost is added. The cost of the HPs was based on the local market (as of year 2020) at EUR8500 for a high efficiency ASHP, EUR4500 for a low-efficiency ASHP, and at EUR6500 for a GSHP.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/27383
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Type: Conference Papers
Affiliation : Cyprus University of Technology 
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed
Appears in Collections:Δημοσιεύσεις σε συνέδρια /Conference papers or poster or presentation

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
2B_6.pdfFulltext160.61 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show full item record

Page view(s)

233
Last Week
1
Last month
14
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s) 10

40
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons