Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/27021
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChiappinotto, Stefania-
dc.contributor.authorPapastavrou, Evridiki-
dc.contributor.authorEfstathiou, Georgios-
dc.contributor.authorAndreou, Panayiota-
dc.contributor.authorStemmer, Renate-
dc.contributor.authorStröhm, Christina-
dc.contributor.authorSchubert, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorDe Wolf-Linder, Susanne-
dc.contributor.authorLonghini, Jessica-
dc.contributor.authorPalese, Alvisa-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-11T05:40:01Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-11T05:40:01Z-
dc.date.issued2022-06-14-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Nursing, vol. 21, articl. no. 137en_US
dc.identifier.issn14726955-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/27021-
dc.description.abstractBackground Unfinished Nursing Care (UNC) concept, that express the condition when nurses are forced to delay or omit required nursing care, has been largely investigated as tasks left undone, missed care, and implicit rationing of nursing care. However, no summary of the available evidence regarding UNC antecedents has been published. The aim of this study is to identify and summarise antecedents of UNC as documented in primary studies to date. Methods A systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted. MEDLINE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and PROSPERO databases were searched for quantitative studies reporting the relationships between antecedents and UNC published after 2004 up to 21 January 2020. The reference lists of secondary studies have been scrutinised to identify additional studies. Two reviewers independently identified studies and evaluated them for their eligibility and disagreements were resolved by the research team. The quality appraisal was based on the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools, according to the study designs. A data extraction grid was piloted and then used to extract data. The antecedents that emerged were thematically categorised with an inductive approach. Results Fifty-eight studies were included; among them, 54 were cross-sectional, three were cohort studies, and one was a quasi-experimental study. They were conducted mainly in the United States and in hospital settings. The UNC antecedents have been investigated to date at the (a) unit (e.g., workloads, non-nursing tasks), (b) nurse (e.g., age, gender), and (c) patient levels (clinical instability). Conclusions At the unit level, it is highly recommended to provide an adequate staff level, strategies to deal with unpredictable workloads, and to promote good practice environments to reduce or minimise UNC. By contrast, at the nurse and patient levels, there were no clear trends regarding modifiable factors that could decrease the occurrence of UNC. The map of antecedents that emerged can be used to design interventional studies aimed at changing research from merely descriptive to that which evaluates the effectiveness of interventions.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Nursingen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s). Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAntecedentsen_US
dc.subjectFactorsen_US
dc.subjectImplicit of nursing careen_US
dc.subjectMissed nursing careen_US
dc.subjectPredictorsen_US
dc.subjectReasonsen_US
dc.subjectSystematic reviewen_US
dc.subjectTasks left undoneen_US
dc.subjectUnfinished nursing careen_US
dc.titleAntecedents of unfinished nursing care: a systematic review of the literatureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Rome Tor Vergataen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus Ministry of Healthen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Nicosiaen_US
dc.collaborationCatholic University of Applied Sciences Mainzen_US
dc.collaborationZurich University of Applied Sciencesen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Udineen_US
dc.subject.categoryHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryItalyen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryGermanyen_US
dc.countrySwitzerlanden_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12912-022-00890-6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35698217-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85131826895-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85131826895-
dc.relation.volume21en_US
cut.common.academicyear2021-2022en_US
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-5128-3651-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2090-5555-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1472-6955-
crisitem.journal.publisherBioMed Central-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
s12912-022-00890-6.pdfFulltext1.93 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
12912_2022_890_MOESM1_ESM.pdfSupplement396.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
checked on Feb 1, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

223
Last Week
0
Last month
2
checked on Jan 30, 2025

Download(s)

242
checked on Jan 30, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons