Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/27004
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCharalambous, Marina-
dc.contributor.authorPhylactou, Phivos-
dc.contributor.authorElriz, Thekla-
dc.contributor.authorPsychogios, Loukia-
dc.contributor.authorAnnoni, Jean-Marie-
dc.contributor.authorKambanaros, Maria-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-08T12:21:03Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-08T12:21:03Z-
dc.date.issued2022-08-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 2022, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 865-880en_US
dc.identifier.issn14606984-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/27004-
dc.description.abstractBackground Evidence-based assessments for people with aphasia (PWA) in Greek are predominantly impairment based. Functional communication (FC) is usually underreported and neglected by clinicians. This study explores the adaptation and psychometric testing of the Greek (GR) version of The Scenario Test. The test assesses the everyday FC of PWA in an interactive multimodal communication setting. Aims To determine the reliability and validity of The Scenario Test-GR and discuss its clinical value. Methods & Procedures The Scenario Test-GR was administered to 54 people with chronic stroke (6+ months post-stroke): 32 PWA and 22 stroke survivors without aphasia. Participants were recruited from Greece and Cyprus. All measures were administered in an interview format. Standard psychometric criteria were applied to evaluate reliability (internal consistency, test–retest, and interrater reliability) and validity (construct and known-groups validity) of The Scenario Test-GR. Outcomes & Results The Scenario Test-GR shows high levels of reliability and validity. High scores of internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.95), test–retest reliability (intra-class coefficients (ICC) = 0.99), and interrater reliability (ICC = 0.99) were found. Interrater agreement in scores on individual items ranged from good to excellent levels of agreement. Correlations with a tool measuring language function in aphasia, a measure of FC, two instruments examining the psychosocial impact of aphasia and a tool measuring non-verbal cognitive skills revealed good convergent validity (all ps < 0.05). Results showed good known-groups validity (Mann–Whitney U = 96.5, p < 0.001), with significantly higher scores for participants without aphasia compared with those with aphasia. Conclusions & Implications The psychometric qualities of The Scenario Test-GR support the reliability and validity of the tool for the assessment of FC in Greek-speaking PWA. The test can be used to assess multimodal FC, promote aphasia rehabilitation goal-setting at the activity and participation levels, and be used as an outcome measure of everyday communication abilities.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational journal of language & communication disordersen_US
dc.rightsThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectThe Scenario Test-GRen_US
dc.subjectFunctional communication assessmenten_US
dc.subjectPeople with aphasia (PWA)en_US
dc.subjectTool validationen_US
dc.titleAdaptation of The Scenario Test for Greek‐speaking people with aphasia: A reliability and validity studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Fribourgen_US
dc.collaborationEuroclinic Groupen_US
dc.subject.categoryHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.countrySwitzerlanden_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1460-6984.12727en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35555844-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85129894889-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12727-
dc.relation.issue4en_US
dc.relation.volume57en_US
cut.common.academicyear2021-2022en_US
dc.identifier.external112960523-
dc.identifier.spage865en_US
dc.identifier.epage880en_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1460-6984-
crisitem.journal.publisherWiley-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5310-3017-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5857-9460-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Charalambous 2022 Scenario Test GR.pdf430.09 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Feb 4, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Nov 1, 2023

Page view(s)

225
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Download(s)

175
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons