Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/26620
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGiannoulakis, Stamatios-
dc.contributor.authorTsapatsoulis, Nicolas-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-16T12:08:08Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-16T12:08:08Z-
dc.date.issued2022-04-01-
dc.identifier.citation15th International Conference on Metadata and Semantic Research, 2021, 29 November – 3 Decemberen_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-030-98876-0-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/26620-
dc.description.abstractImages are an important part of collection items in any digital library. Mining information from social media networks, and especially the Instagram, for Image description has recently gained increased research interest. In the current study we extend previous work on the use of topic modelling for mining tags from Instagram hashtags for image content description. We examine whether the hashtags accompanying Instagram photos, collected via a common query hashtag (called ‘subject’ hereafter), vary in a statistically significant manner depending on the similarity of their visual content. In the experiment we use the topics mined from Instagram hashtags from a set of Instagram images corresponding to 26 different query hashtags and classified into two categories per subject, named as ‘relevant’ and ‘irrelevant’ depending on the similarity of their visual content. Two different set of users, namely trained students and generic crowd, assess the topics presented to them as word clouds. To invest whether there is significant difference between the word clouds of the images considered as visually relevant to the query subject compared to those considered visually irrelevant. At the same time we investigate whether the word cloud interpretations of trained students and generic crowd differ. The data collected through this empirical study are analyzed with use of independent samples t-test and Pearson rho. We conclude that the word clouds of the relevant Instagram images are much more easily interpretable by both the trained students and the crowd. The results also show some interesting variations across subjects which are analysed and discussed in detail throughout the paper. At the same time the interpretations of trained students and the generic crowd are highly correlated, denoting that no specific training is required to mine relevant tags from Instagram hashtags to describe the accompanied Instagram photos.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights© Springer Natureen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectDigital librariesen_US
dc.subjectTopic modellingen_US
dc.subjectInstagram hashtagsen_US
dc.subjectImage taggingen_US
dc.subjectVisualisationen_US
dc.titleTopic Identification of Instagram Hashtag Sets for Image Tagging: An Empirical Assessmenten_US
dc.typeConference Papersen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryComputer and Information Sciencesen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldNatural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.relation.conferenceInternational Conference on Metadata and Semantics Researchen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-98876-0_14en_US
cut.common.academicyear2021-2022en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_c94f-
item.openairetypeconferenceObject-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptLibrary and Information Services-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Communication and Marketing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-3020-3717-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-6739-8602-
crisitem.author.parentorgCyprus University of Technology-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
Appears in Collections:Δημοσιεύσεις σε συνέδρια /Conference papers or poster or presentation
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 50

1
checked on Nov 6, 2023

Page view(s)

275
Last Week
2
Last month
11
checked on May 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons