Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/25910
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKyriacou Georgiou, Mary-
dc.contributor.authorMerkouris, Anastasios-
dc.contributor.authorHadjibalassi, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorSarafis, Pavlos-
dc.contributor.authorKyprianou, Theodoros-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-04T12:28:09Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-04T12:28:09Z-
dc.date.issued2021-11-
dc.identifier.citationCureus, 2021, vol. 13, no. 11, articl. no. e19244en_US
dc.identifier.issn21688184-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/25910-
dc.description.abstractBackground Over time, the multidimensional nature of the safety culture in the healthcare field has led to great efforts to improve quality and create tools aiming at enhancing safety. In particular, emphasis has been placed on teamwork and the safety climate. There is a strong relationship between these two complex elements, which interact to improve the safety climate and reduce patient-safety issues. In this study, "teamwork" includes the perceptions of the health professionals collaborating within a health team to provide safe patient care, and "safety climate" refers to the professional commitment to patient safety. Objective This article assesses health professionals' perceptions of both patient-safety issues and teamwork in their hospital work environment after the development and implementation of a comprehensive quality-assurance system. Methods This descriptive correlation study is based on anonymous and self-completed questionnaires obtained after the development and implementation of a comprehensive quality assurance system in the wards and departments of Nicosia General Hospital. The research sample consisted of the health professionals who participated in the working groups that implemented the quality assurance system. We used the questionnaire's sociodemographic data and the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) developed in the Deepening our Understanding of Quality Improvement in Europe program, focusing on two factors: Teamwork and the safety climate. Results While teamwork received a positive score (>75%), the same did not occur for the safety climate (68.60%). Women typically rated the safety climate more positively than men, who mostly gave negative ratings (p = 0.005). There was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.011) in the scores between participants aged 24-44 and those aged 45-54, with the latter reporting higher teamwork scores. The participants' educational levels also played important roles in their responses, with university graduates (BSc) providing more positive teamwork scores than those with a master's degree (p = 0.018). Conclusions Our research revealed that the health professionals of Nicosia General Hospital perceived the teamwork climate as positive, in contrast to the safety climate. The results highlight the need not only to intervene in all the areas covered by the SAQ to improve the safety climate but also to keep encouraging teamwork to obtain better results.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCureusen_US
dc.rights© Copyright 2021 Kyriacou Georgiou et al.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectDeepening our understanding of quality improvement in europeen_US
dc.subjectSafety attitudes questionnaireen_US
dc.subjectHospitalsen_US
dc.subjectHealth professionalsen_US
dc.subjectTeamworken_US
dc.subjectSafety climateen_US
dc.titleCorrelation Between Teamwork and Patient Safety in a Tertiary Hospital in Cyprusen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationNicosia General Hospitalen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Thessalyen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Nicosiaen_US
dc.collaborationKing's College Hospitalen_US
dc.subject.categoryBasic Medicineen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.7759/cureus.19244en_US
dc.identifier.pmid34877219-
dc.relation.issue11en_US
dc.relation.volume13en_US
cut.common.academicyear2020-2021en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn2168-8184-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8515-007X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-7782-3131-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9967-5152-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
KYRIACOU.pdf133.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

215
Last Week
3
Last month
10
checked on May 11, 2024

Download(s)

88
checked on May 11, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons