Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/25903
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBurston, Jack-
dc.contributor.authorGiannakou, Konstantinos-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-04T10:12:25Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-04T10:12:25Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationReCALL, FirstView, 2021, pp. 1-22en_US
dc.identifier.issn09583440-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/25903-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to comprehensively evaluate quantitative experimental mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) studies published between 1994 and 2019 that meet minimal conditions of research design and statistical analysis. Starting with a bibliographical database of 1,144 references to experimental MALL implementations, of which there were 700 objectively substantiated by quantitative experimental language learning outcomes, only 84 experimental MALL studies met the inclusion requirements. Their analysis addresses two critical sets of research questions. First, what are the general characteristics of the selected studies and, second, what are their language learning outcomes in terms of measured effect size. Nine general characteristics are considered: Publication source, chronological distribution, country of origin, institutional environment, sample size, intervention duration, targeted language, language learner competence level, and learning focus. Effect size was calculated separately for between-group (independent, experimental) and within-group (quasi-experimental) treatment studies. In both cases, the overall results were quite large: 0.72 for the former and 1.16 for the latter. An analysis of four critical moderator variables (language learner competence level, language area focus, institutional environment, and intervention duration) revealed similarly large effect sizes. Notwithstanding, analysis of the data also confirmed obvious publication bias and a very high level of heterogeneity that frequently approached 100%. The relevance of positive language learning outcome conclusions thus needs to be tempered by these shortcomings.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofReCALLen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s).en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectMobile-assisted language learningen_US
dc.subjectMALLen_US
dc.subjectLanguage learning outcomesen_US
dc.subjectEffect sizeen_US
dc.subjectResearch designen_US
dc.titleMALL language learning outcomes: A comprehensive meta-analysis 1994-2019en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationEuropean University Cyprusen_US
dc.subject.categoryComputer and Information Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldNatural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0958344021000240en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85116083420-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85116083420-
cut.common.academicyear2020-2021en_US
dc.identifier.spage1en_US
dc.identifier.epage22en_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.author.deptLanguage Centre-
crisitem.author.facultyLanguage Centre-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2905-5585-
crisitem.author.parentorgCyprus University of Technology-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 50

22
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

13
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 50

245
Last Week
0
Last month
2
checked on Dec 17, 2024

Download(s) 50

156
checked on Dec 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons