Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/24694
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZis, Thalis-
dc.contributor.authorPsaraftis, Harilaos N.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-23T11:35:15Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-23T11:35:15Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationMaritime Policy and Management, 2019, vol. 46, iss. 1en_US
dc.identifier.issn03088839-
dc.identifier.issn14645254-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/24694-
dc.description.abstract<p>On 1 January 2015, the sulphur upper limit for marine fuels used within sulphur emission control areas was lowered from 1% to 0.1%, with which vessels can comply only through using pricier ultra-low-sulphur fuel, or investing in abatement technologies. A potential increase of fuel prices could lead to closures of services due to the combined effects of loss of market due to higher freight rates, and increased operational costs. This paper builds on previous work allowing the modelling of modal shifts between sea and land-based options, and assesses the potential of operational measures that ship-owners can deploy to cope with the threat of the low-sulphur requirements. The measures include speed reduction, change of service frequency, use of alternative fuels such as liquefied natural gas, investments in scrubber systems, and improved fleet assignment. The proposed measures are tested on a set of case studies for services that are part of a short sea shipping network of a leading Ro-Ro operator. The results of this work can be useful to practitioners seeking to design new strategies that improve the resilience of their network, as well as to regulatory bodies designing new regulation that could have negative implications on certain sectors.</p>en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMaritime Policy and Managementen_US
dc.rights© Informaen_US
dc.subjectsulphur legislationen_US
dc.subjectMaritime logisticsen_US
dc.subjectRo-Ro shippingen_US
dc.subjectshipping emissionsen_US
dc.subjectshort sea shippingen_US
dc.titleOperational measures to mitigate and reverse the potential modal shifts due to environmental legislationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationTechnical University of Denmarken_US
dc.subject.categoryOther Engineering and Technologiesen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryDenmarken_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03088839.2018.1468938en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85046010809-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2018.1468938-
dc.relation.issue1en_US
dc.relation.volume46en_US
cut.common.academicyear2018-2019en_US
dc.identifier.external44799090-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1464-5254-
crisitem.journal.publisherTaylor & Francis-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Shipping-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Management and Economics-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1437-9555-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Management and Economics-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

43
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

36
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

225
Last Week
1
Last month
5
checked on Jul 17, 2024

Download(s)

122
checked on Jul 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.