Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/24654
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZis, Thalis-
dc.contributor.authorCullinane, Kevin-
dc.contributor.authorRicci, Stefano-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-23T09:59:57Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-23T09:59:57Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationMaritime Policy & Management, 2021en_US
dc.identifier.issn03088839-
dc.identifier.issn14645254-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/24654-
dc.description.abstractThe International Maritime Organization (IMO) has implemented a series of increasingly stricter regulations to reduce sulphur emissions from international shipping. As of January 2020, the global sulphur cap requires the use of fuel containing a maximum of 0.5% sulphur content, or the use of technology achieving a similar reduction in sulphur emissions. Deciding between fuel switching or investing in abatement technologies has been a recurring topic for research in the last decade, with a focus on shipping activities within Emission Control Areas (ECAs). The quest for the desulphurization of shipping results in higher operating costs as well as CO2 emissions. We estimate the economic and environmental impacts of compliance with sulphur limits for a variety of representative ship types. This paper quantitatively assesses case studies across the most important shipping sectors highlighting their different challenges. The results confirm that scrubber investments are more profitable at times of higher fuel prices, and for ships that spend relatively more time sailing. We show that the potential for speed differentiation inside and outside ECAs has been diminished. This framework can be a useful decision support system for selecting the best response amongst different compliance options to environmental regulations.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMaritime Policy and Managementen_US
dc.rights© Informaen_US
dc.subjecttransport policyen_US
dc.subjectpayback perioden_US
dc.subjectSulphur emissionsen_US
dc.subjectMaritime transporten_US
dc.subjectScrubbersen_US
dc.titleEconomic and environmental impacts of scrubbers investments in shipping: a multi-sectoral analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationTechnical University of Denmarken_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Gothenburgen_US
dc.collaborationUniversita Degli Studi Di Roma la Sapienzaen_US
dc.subject.categoryOther Engineering and Technologiesen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryDenmarken_US
dc.countrySwedenen_US
dc.countryItalyen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03088839.2021.1937742en_US
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2021.1937742-
cut.common.academicyear2020-2021en_US
dc.identifier.external96132027-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1464-5254-
crisitem.journal.publisherTaylor & Francis-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Shipping-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Management and Economics-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1437-9555-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Management and Economics-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
MPM Zis et al 2021 Postprint.pdfpostprint1.31 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
checked on Nov 6, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

11
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

237
Last Week
0
Last month
3
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s)

397
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.