Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/24651
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMelia, Georgia-
dc.contributor.authorSiegkas, Petros-
dc.contributor.authorLevick, Jodie-
dc.contributor.authorApps, Charlotte-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-23T09:54:55Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-23T09:54:55Z-
dc.date.issued2020-11-03-
dc.identifier.citationApplied Ergonomics, 2020, vol. 91en_US
dc.identifier.issn00036870-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/24651-
dc.description.abstractThere is limited evidence on the efficacy of insole materials to reduce plantar pressure during regular walking and loaded walking. In-shoe plantar pressures and subjective footwear comfort were recorded in twenty healthy participants at a self-selected treadmill walking speed in six conditions: two commercial insoles or no insole, and with or without carrying a load in a backpack. A single-material insole, comprised of polyurethane, had reduced density and compressive stiffness compared to a dual-material insole with added viscoelastic material in rearfoot and forefoot regions. Load carriage increased peak pressure across the foot. Both insoles reduced plantar pressure in the rearfoot. Yet, the softer single-material insole also attenuated forefoot pressure and loaded walking did not appear to cause bottoming-out of the polyurethane. Plantar pressure changes did not affect perceived footwear comfort. The softer single-material insole was more effective in reducing plantar pressure, further research would confirm if this influences injury prevalence.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Ergonomicsen_US
dc.rights© Elsevieren_US
dc.subjectPlantar pressureen_US
dc.subjectLoad-carriageen_US
dc.subjectDensityen_US
dc.titleInsoles of uniform softer material reduced plantar pressure compared to dual-material insoles during regular and loaded gaiten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationNottingham Trent Universityen_US
dc.subject.categoryENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGYen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103298en_US
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103298-
dc.relation.volume91en_US
cut.common.academicyear2020-2021en_US
dc.identifier.external88858173-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science and Engineering-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9528-2247-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
checked on Nov 6, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Sep 13, 2023

Page view(s)

224
Last Week
2
Last month
6
checked on Oct 11, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.