Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/24544
Title: | Comparative Experimental and Numerical Study of Wave Loads on A Monopile Structure Using Different Turbulence Models | Authors: | Zeng, Xin meng Shi, Wei Michailides, Constantine Wang, Kai Li, Xin |
Major Field of Science: | Engineering and Technology | Field Category: | Civil Engineering | Keywords: | Hydrodynamic loads;Monopile structure;Morison equation;Numerical wave tank;Turbulence models;Wave run-up | Issue Date: | 1-Sep-2021 | Source: | China Ocean Engineering, 2021, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 554-565 | Volume: | 35 | Issue: | 4 | Start page: | 554 | End page: | 565 | Journal: | China Ocean Engineering | Abstract: | This study numerically and experimentally investigates the effects of wave loads on a monopile-type offshore wind turbine placed on a 1: 25 slope at different water depths as well as the effect of choosing different turbulence models on the efficiency of the numerical model. The numerical model adopts a two-phase flow by solving Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) equations using the Volume Of Fluid (VOF) method and three different k — ω turbulence models. Typical environmental conditions from the East China Sea are studied. The wave run-up and the wave loads applied on the monopile are investigated and compared with relevant experimental data as well as with mathematical predictions based on relevant theories. The numerical model is well validated against the experimental data at model scale. The use of different turbulence models results in different predictions on the wave height but less differences on the wave period. The baseline k — ω turbulence model and Shear-Stress Transport (SST) k — ω turbulence model exhibit better performance on the prediction of hydrodynamic load, at a model-scale water depth of 0.42 m, while the laminar model provides better results for large water depths. The SST k — ω turbulence model performs better in predicting wave run-up for water depth 0.42 m, while the laminar model and standard k — ω model perform better at water depth 0.52 m and 0.62 m, respectively. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/24544 | ISSN: | 08905487 | DOI: | 10.1007/s13344-021-0050-z | Rights: | © Chinese Ocean Engineering Society and Springer | Type: | Article | Affiliation : | Dalian University of Technology Cyprus University of Technology Sun Yat-sen University |
Publication Type: | Peer Reviewed |
Appears in Collections: | Άρθρα/Articles |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
3
checked on Mar 14, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
2
Last Week
0
0
Last month
1
1
checked on Oct 29, 2023
Page view(s)
239
Last Week
1
1
Last month
3
3
checked on Dec 22, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License