Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/24366
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDonat, Cornelius K.-
dc.contributor.authorLopez, Maria Yanez-
dc.contributor.authorSastre, Magdalena-
dc.contributor.authorBaxan, Nicoleta-
dc.contributor.authorGoldfinger, Marc-
dc.contributor.authorSeeamber, Reneira-
dc.contributor.authorMuller, Franziska-
dc.contributor.authorDavies, Polly-
dc.contributor.authorHellyer, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorSiegkas, Petros-
dc.contributor.authorGentleman, Steve-
dc.contributor.authorSharp, David J.-
dc.contributor.authorGhajari, Mazdak-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-18T11:38:46Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-18T11:38:46Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationBrain, 2021, vol. 144, iss. 1en_US
dc.identifier.issn14602156-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/24366-
dc.description.abstractThe relationship between biomechanical forces and neuropathology is key to understanding traumatic brain injury. White matter tracts are damaged by high shear forces during impact, resulting in axonal injury, a key determinant of long-term clinical outcomes. However, the relationship between biomechanical forces and patterns of white matter injuries, associated with persistent diffusion MRI abnormalities, is poorly understood. This limits the ability to predict the severity of head injuries and the design of appropriate protection. Our previously developed human finite element model of head injury predicted the location of post-traumatic neurodegeneration. A similar rat model now allows us to experimentally test whether strain patterns calculated by the model predicts in vivo MRI and histology changes. Using a controlled cortical impact, mild and moderate injuries (1 and 2 mm) were performed. Focal and axonal injuries were quantified with volumetric and diffusion 9.4 T MRI at 2 weeks post injury. Detailed analysis of the corpus callosum was conducted using multi-shell diffusion MRI and histopathology. Microglia and astrocyte density, including process parameters, along with white matter structural integrity and neurofilament expression were determined by quantitative immunohistochemistry. Linear mixed effects regression analyses for strain and strain rate with the employed outcome measures were used to ascertain how well immediate biomechanics could explain MRI and histology changes. The spatial pattern of mechanical strain and strain rate in the injured cortex shows good agreement with the probability maps of focal lesions derived from volumetric MRI. Diffusion metrics showed abnormalities in the corpus callosum, indicating white matter changes in the segments subjected to high strain, as predicted by the model. The same segments also exhibited a severity-dependent increase in glia cell density, white matter thinning and reduced neurofilament expression. Linear mixed effects regression analyses showed that mechanical strain and strain rate were significant predictors of in vivo MRI and histology changes. Specifically, strain and strain rate respectively explained 33% and 28% of the reduction in fractional anisotropy, 51% and 29% of the change in neurofilament expression and 51% and 30% of microglia density changes. The work provides evidence that strain and strain rate in the first milliseconds after injury are important factors in determining patterns of glial and axonal injury and serve as experimental validators of our computational model of traumatic brain injury. Our results provide support for the use of this model in understanding the relationship of biomechanics and neuropathology and can guide the development of head protection systems, such as airbags and helmets.</jats:p>en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBrainen_US
dc.rightsThe Author(s)en_US
dc.subjecttraumatic brain injuryen_US
dc.subjectdiffusion tensor imagingen_US
dc.subjectfinite element modellingen_US
dc.subjectquantitative histologyen_US
dc.titleFrom biomechanics to pathology: predicting axonal injury from patterns of strain after traumatic brain injuryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationImperial College Londonen_US
dc.collaborationKing's College Londonen_US
dc.subject.categoryMedical Engineeringen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.subject.fieldNatural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/brain/awaa336en_US
dc.identifier.pmid33454735-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85100248623-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa336-
dc.relation.issue1en_US
dc.relation.volume144en_US
cut.common.academicyear2020-2021en_US
dc.identifier.external101763467-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science and Engineering-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9528-2247-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
awaa336.pdfOpen Access2.31 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

36
checked on Feb 1, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

31
Last Week
0
Last month
3
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

222
Last Week
1
Last month
2
checked on Oct 5, 2024

Download(s)

156
checked on Oct 5, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.