Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/24341
Title: Trivial Excitation Energy Transfer to Carotenoids Is an Unlikely Mechanism for Non-photochemical Quenching in LHCII
Authors: Gray, Callum 
Wei, Tiejun 
Polívka, Tomáš 
Daskalakis, Vangelis 
Duffy, Christopher D P 
Major Field of Science: Agricultural Sciences
Field Category: Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries
Keywords: LHCII;Carotenoid;Energy-dissipation;Non-photochemical quenching (NPQ);Photosystem (PSII);Transient absorption
Issue Date: 13-Jan-2022
Source: Frontiers in Plant Science, 2022, vol. 12, articl. no. 797373
Volume: 12
Journal: Frontiers in Plant Science 
Abstract: Higher plants defend themselves from bursts of intense light via the mechanism of Non-Photochemical Quenching (NPQ). It involves the Photosystem II (PSII) antenna protein (LHCII) adopting a conformation that favors excitation quenching. In recent years several structural models have suggested that quenching proceeds via energy transfer to the optically forbidden and short-lived S 1 states of a carotenoid. It was proposed that this pathway was controlled by subtle changes in the relative orientation of a small number of pigments. However, quantum chemical calculations of S 1 properties are not trivial and therefore its energy, oscillator strength and lifetime are treated as rather loose parameters. Moreover, the models were based either on a single LHCII crystal structure or Molecular Dynamics (MD) trajectories about a single minimum. Here we try and address these limitations by parameterizing the vibronic structure and relaxation dynamics of lutein in terms of observable quantities, namely its linear absorption (LA), transient absorption (TA) and two-photon excitation (TPE) spectra. We also analyze a number of minima taken from an exhaustive meta-dynamical search of the LHCII free energy surface. We show that trivial, Coulomb-mediated energy transfer to S 1 is an unlikely quenching mechanism, with pigment movements insufficiently pronounced to switch the system between quenched and unquenched states. Modulation of S 1 energy level as a quenching switch is similarly unlikely. Moreover, the quenching predicted by previous models is possibly an artifact of quantum chemical over-estimation of S 1 oscillator strength and the real mechanism likely involves short-range interaction and/or non-trivial inter-molecular states.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/24341
ISSN: 1664462X
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.797373
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Type: Article
Affiliation : Queen Mary University of London 
University of South Bohemia 
Cyprus University of Technology 
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles

CORE Recommender
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
checked on Mar 20, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

9
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

278
Last Week
0
Last month
7
checked on Dec 21, 2024

Download(s)

226
checked on Dec 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons