Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/24314
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSiegkas, Petros-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-17T13:41:09Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-17T13:41:09Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationPolymer Testing, 2020, vol. 90en_US
dc.identifier.issn01429418-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/24314-
dc.description.abstractAdditive manufacturing offers a useful and accessible tool for prototyping and manufacturing small volume functional parts. Polylactic acid (PLA) and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) are amongst the most commonly used materials. Characterising 3D printed PLA and TPU is potentially important for both designing and finite element modelling of functional parts. This work explores the mechanical properties of additively manufactured PLA/TPU specimens with consideration to design parameters including size, and infill percentage. PLA/TPU specimens are 3D-printed in selected ISO standard geometries with 20%, 60%, 100% infill percentage. Tensile and compression test results suggest that traditional ISO testing standards might be insufficient in characterising 3D printed materials for finite element modelling or application purposes. Infill percentage in combination to design size, may significantly affect the mechanical performance of 3D printed parts. Dimensional variation may cause inhomogeneity in mechanical properties between large and small cross section areas of the same part. The effect was reduced in small cross section parts where reducing the nominal infill had less effect on the resulting specimens. The results suggest that for 3D printed functional parts with significant dimensional differences between sections, the material properties are not necessarily homogeneous. This consideration may be significant for designers using 3D printing for applications, which include mechanical loading.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPolymer Testingen_US
dc.rights© Elsevieren_US
dc.subject3D printingen_US
dc.subject3D printed material characterisationen_US
dc.subjectInfill percentageen_US
dc.subjectPLAen_US
dc.subjectTPUen_US
dc.subjectISO standarden_US
dc.subjectDimensional variationen_US
dc.titleDimensional considerations on the mechanical properties of 3D printed polymer partsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationNottingham Trent Universityen_US
dc.subject.categoryMechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106656en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85087427486-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106656-
dc.relation.volume90en_US
cut.common.academicyear2020-2021en_US
dc.identifier.external75929777-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science and Engineering-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9528-2247-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

43
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

35
Last Week
1
Last month
2
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

212
Last Week
2
Last month
5
checked on Jul 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.