Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/24119
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUsher-Smith, Juliet A.-
dc.contributor.authorEmery, Jon-
dc.contributor.authorKassianos, Angelos P.-
dc.contributor.authorWalter, Fiona M.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-15T10:32:08Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-15T10:32:08Z-
dc.date.issued2014-01-01-
dc.identifier.citationCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, 2014, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1450-1463en_US
dc.identifier.issn10559965-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/24119-
dc.description.abstractMelanoma incidence is increasing rapidly worldwide among white-skinned populations. Earlier diagnosis is the principal factor that can improve prognosis. Defining high-risk populations using risk prediction models may help targeted screening and early detection approaches. In this systematic review, we searched Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for primary research studies reporting or validating models to predict risk of developing cutaneous melanoma. A total of 4,141 articles were identified from the literature search and six through citation searching. Twenty-five risk models were included. Between them, the models considered 144 possible risk factors, including 18 measures of number of nevi and 26 of sun/UV exposure. Those most frequently included in final risk models were number of nevi, presence of freckles, history of sunburn, hair color, and skin color. Despite the different factors included and different cutoff values for sensitivity and specificity, almost all models yielded sensitivities and specificities that fit along a summary ROC with area under the ROC (AUROC) of 0.755, suggesting that most models had similar discrimination. Only two models have been validated in separate populations and both also showed good discrimination with AUROC values of 0.79 (0.70-0.86) and 0.70 (0.64-0.77). Further research should focus on validating existing models rather than developing new ones.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Preventionen_US
dc.rights© American Association for Cancer Researchen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectMelanomaen_US
dc.subjectCancer risken_US
dc.subjectStatistical modelen_US
dc.titleRisk prediction models for melanoma: A systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Cambridgeen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Melbourneen_US
dc.subject.categoryOther Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryAustraliaen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0295en_US
dc.identifier.pmid24895414-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84905454857-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84905454857-
dc.relation.issue8en_US
dc.relation.volume23en_US
cut.common.academicyear2013-2014en_US
dc.identifier.spage1450en_US
dc.identifier.epage1463en_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6428-2623-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 20

100
checked on Feb 1, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

89
Last Week
1
Last month
2
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 20

186
Last Week
2
Last month
10
checked on May 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons