Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/24090
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMareva, Silvana-
dc.contributor.authorThomson, David-
dc.contributor.authorMarenco, Pietro-
dc.contributor.authorEstal-Muñoz, Víctor-
dc.contributor.authorOtt, Caroline V.-
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Barbara-
dc.contributor.authorWingen, Tobias-
dc.contributor.authorKassianos, Angelos P.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-14T17:15:14Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-14T17:15:14Z-
dc.date.issued2016-07-18-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Psychology, 2016, vol. 7, articl. no. 1086en_US
dc.identifier.issn16641078-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/24090-
dc.description.abstractHealth-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) is a construct of increasing importance in modern healthcare, and has typically been assessed using retrospective instruments. While such measures have been shown to have predictive utility for clinical outcomes, several cognitive biases associated with human recall and current mood state may undermine their validity and reliability. Retrospective tools can be further criticized for their lack of ecology, as individuals are usually assessed in less natural settings such as hospitals and health centers, and may be obliged to spend time and money traveling to receive assessment. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is an alternative, as mobile assessment using mobile health (mHealth) technology has the potential to minimize biases and overcome many of these limitations. Employing an EMA methodology, we will use a smartphone application to collect data on real-time HRQoL, with an adapted version of the widely used WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire. We aim to recruit a total of 450 healthy participants. Participants will be prompted by the application to report their real-time HRQoL over 2 weeks together with information on mood and current activities. At the end of 2 weeks, they will complete a retrospective assessment of their HRQoL and they will provide information about their sleep quality and perceived stress. The psychometric properties of real-time HRQoL will be assessed, including analysis of the factorial structure, reliability and validity of the measure, and compared with retrospective HRQoL responses for the same 2-week testing period. Further, we aim to identify factors associated with real-time HRQoL (e.g., mood, activities), the feasibility of the application, and within- and between-person variability in real-time HRQoL. We expect real-time HRQoL to have adequate validity and reliability, and positive responses on the feasibility of using a smartphone application for routine HRQoL assessment. The direct comparison of real-time and retrospective measures in this study will provide important novel insight into the efficacy of mHealth applications for HRQoL assessment. If shown to be valid, reliable and feasible for the collection of HRQoL data, mHealth applications may have future potential for facilitating clinical assessment, patient-physician communication, and monitoring individual HRQoL over course of treatment.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Psychologyen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s).en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectMobile healthen_US
dc.subjectHealth-related quality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectEcological momentary assessmenten_US
dc.subjectSleep qualityen_US
dc.subjectReal-time assessmenten_US
dc.subjectSmartphone applicationen_US
dc.titleStudy protocol on ecological momentary assessment of health-related quality of life using a smartphone applicationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationThe University of Edinburghen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Glasgowen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Bolognaen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Madriden_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Copenhagenen_US
dc.collaborationBudapest University of Technology and Economicsen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Cologneen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity College Londonen_US
dc.subject.categoryPsychologyen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.countryItalyen_US
dc.countrySpainen_US
dc.countryDenmarken_US
dc.countryHungaryen_US
dc.countryGermanyen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01086en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27486425-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84982198658-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84982198658-
dc.relation.volume7en_US
cut.common.academicyear2015-2016en_US
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1664-1078-
crisitem.journal.publisherFrontiers-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6428-2623-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
fpsyg_07_01086_pdf.pdf1.56 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
checked on Feb 2, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

206
Last Week
3
Last month
9
checked on May 5, 2024

Download(s) 20

114
checked on May 5, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons