Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/24086
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUsher-Smith, Juliet A.-
dc.contributor.authorKassianos, Angelos P.-
dc.contributor.authorEmery, Jon David-
dc.contributor.authorAbel, Gary-
dc.contributor.authorTeoh, Z.-
dc.contributor.authorHall, Susan-
dc.contributor.authorNeal, Richard-
dc.contributor.authorMurchie, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorWalter, Fiona-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-14T17:06:03Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-14T17:06:03Z-
dc.date.issued2017-04-
dc.identifier.citationThe British Journal of Dermatology, 2017, vol. 176, no. 4, pp. 939–948en_US
dc.identifier.issn00070963-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/24086-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Melanoma incidence is rising rapidly worldwide among white populations. Defining higher-risk populations using risk prediction models may help targeted screening and early detection approaches. Objectives: To assess the feasibility of identifying people at higher risk of melanoma using the Williams self-assessed clinical risk estimation model in U.K. primary care. Methods: We recruited participants from the waiting rooms of 22 general practices covering a total population of > 240 000 in three U.K. regions: Eastern England, North East Scotland and North Wales. Participants completed an electronic questionnaire using tablet computers. The main outcome was the mean melanoma risk score using the Williams melanoma risk model.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofThe British Journal of Dermatologyen_US
dc.rights© The Authors.British Journal of Dermatologyen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectMelanomaen_US
dc.subjectWilliams self-assessed clinical risk estimation modelen_US
dc.titleIdentifying people at higher risk of melanoma across the U.K.: a primary-care-based electronic surveyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Cambridgeen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity College Londonen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Melbourneen_US
dc.collaborationBetsi Cadwaladr University Health Boarden_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Aberdeenen_US
dc.collaborationBangor Universityen_US
dc.subject.categoryOther Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.countryAustraliaen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/bjd.15181en_US
dc.identifier.pmid28009060-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85007359345-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85007359345-
dc.relation.issue4en_US
dc.relation.volume176en_US
cut.common.academicyear2016-2017en_US
dc.identifier.spage939en_US
dc.identifier.epage948en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6428-2623-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 50

16
checked on Feb 1, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

15
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

198
Last Week
0
Last month
3
checked on Sep 3, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons