Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/24083
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKassianos, Angelos P.-
dc.contributor.authorGeorgiou, Giorgos-
dc.contributor.authorPapaconstantinou, Electra P.-
dc.contributor.authorDetzortzi, Angeliki-
dc.contributor.authorHorne, Rob-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-14T16:48:58Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-14T16:48:58Z-
dc.date.issued2017-10-11-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Psychology, 2017, vol. 8, articl. no. 1769en_US
dc.identifier.issn16641078-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/24083-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Patients prescribed with medication that treats mental health conditions benefit the most compared to those prescribed with other types of medication. However, they are also the most difficult to adhere. The development of mobile health (mHealth) applications ("apps") to help patients monitor their adherence is fast growing but with limited evidence on their efficacy. There is no evidence on the content of these apps for patients taking psychotropic medication. The aim of this study is to identify and evaluate the aims and functioning of available apps that are aiming to help and educate patients to adhere to medication that treats mental health conditions. Method: Three platform descriptions (Apple, Google, and Microsoft) were searched between October 2015 and February 2016. Included apps need to focus on adherence to medication that treats mental health conditions and use at least a reinforcement strategy. Descriptive information was extracted and apps evaluated on a number of assessment criteria using content analysis. Results: Sixteen apps were identified. All apps included self-monitoring properties like reminders and psycho-educational properties like mood logs. It was unclear how the latter were used or how adherence was measured. Major barriers to medication adherence like patients' illness and medication beliefs and attitudes were not considered nor where information to patients about mediation side effects. Very few apps were tailored and none was developed based on established theories explaining the processes for successful medication adherence like cognitions and beliefs. Reported information on app development and validation was poor. Discussion: A variety of apps with different properties that tackle both intentional and unintentional non-adherence from a different perspective are identified. An evidence-based approach and co-creation with patients is needed. This will ensure that the apps increase the possibility to impact on non-adherence. Theories like social cognition models can be useful in ensuring that patients' education, motivation, skills, beliefs, and type of adherence are taken into consideration when developing the apps. Findings from this study can help clinicians and patients make informed choices and pursue policy-makers to integrate evidence when developing future apps. Quality-assurance tools are needed to ensure the apps are systematically evaluated.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Psychologyen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s).en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAdherenceen_US
dc.subjectPsychotropicen_US
dc.subjectmHealthen_US
dc.subjectSmartphoneen_US
dc.subjectComplianceen_US
dc.subjectHealth educationen_US
dc.subjectMental healthen_US
dc.subjectDigital healthen_US
dc.titleSmartphone applications for educating and helping non-motivating patients adhere to medication that treats mental health conditions: Aims and functioningen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity College Londonen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Cyprusen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus Institute of Neurology and Geneticsen_US
dc.subject.categoryOther Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01769en_US
dc.identifier.pmid29075216-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85031006873-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85031006873-
dc.relation.volume8en_US
cut.common.academicyear2016-2017en_US
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6428-2623-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1664-1078-
crisitem.journal.publisherFrontiers-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
fpsyg_08_01769_pdf.pdf720.18 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
checked on Feb 1, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

230
Last Week
0
Last month
6
checked on Jan 29, 2025

Download(s) 20

160
checked on Jan 29, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons